Cited by
Opinions in Arizona that cite State Compensation Fund v. Keefe, 526 P.2d 1266.
-
corecivic/aiu Insurance v. Wallace
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2026
(finding employee’s magazine writing was within the course of his employment and “not merely for his own personal enjoyment”).
- Fayette A/C /Colorado v. Rickard Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
- Fayette A/C /Colorado v. Rickard Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
- Anderson Clayton & Co. v. Industrial Commission 607 P.2d 22 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1979
- Anderson Clayton & Co. v. Industrial Commission 607 P.2d 22 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1979
- Peetz v. Industrial Commission 604 P.2d 255 Ariz. 1979
- Peetz v. Industrial Commission 604 P.2d 255 Ariz. 1979
- Peetz v. Industrial Commission 604 P.2d 263 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1979
- Peetz v. Industrial Commission 604 P.2d 263 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1979
- Gates v. Industrial Commission 578 P.2d 607 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1977
- Gates v. Industrial Commission 578 P.2d 607 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1977
- Adams v. Industrial Commission 547 P.2d 1089 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1976
-
Adams v. Industrial Commission
547 P.2d 1089
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1976
E. g., , P.2d 197 (1965).
- Harbor Insurance Company v. Industrial Commission 545 P.2d 458 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1976
-
Harbor Insurance Company v. Industrial Commission
545 P.2d 458
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1976
It is axiomatic that an award of the Industrial Commission will not be set aside if there is reasonable evidence to support it, , and that conflicts in medical testimony are to be resolved by the hearing officer, , Brewer v. Industrial Commission of Arizona, 9 Ariz.App.
- Zambonini v. Industrial Commission 544 P.2d 710 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1976
-
Zambonini v. Industrial Commission
544 P.2d 710
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1976
Brewer v. Industrial Commission of Arizona, 9 Ariz.App.
- S. L. C. Leasing v. Industrial Commission 543 P.2d 795 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1975
- S. L. C. Leasing v. Industrial Commission 543 P.2d 795 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1975
- Nelson v. Industrial Commission 536 P.2d 215 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1975
- Nelson v. Industrial Commission 536 P.2d 215 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1975
- Stoddard v. Industrial Commission 532 P.2d 177 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1975
- Stoddard v. Industrial Commission 532 P.2d 177 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1975
- Gonzales v. Industrial Commission 531 P.2d 555 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1975
-
Gonzales v. Industrial Commission
531 P.2d 555
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1975
“As a general rule, an employee is injured in the course of his employment if the employee was involved in an activity he might reasonably be expected to undertake during such time, and if the employee was at a place where he could reasonably be expected to be when the accident occur