Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite In Re the Appeal in Maricopa County, Juvenile Action No. JS-4130, 647 P.2d 184.

32 citing documents.

Kari M. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
Kari M. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
Action No. JS-4130, (vacating and remanding when termination proceedings occur under incorrect burden of proof).
Denise R. v. Ades, Draven R. and Larsen R. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2009
Denise R. v. Ades, Draven R. and Larsen R. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2009
Relying on In re Maricopa County Juvenile Action No. JS-4130, P.2d 184 (App. 1982), ADES disputes Denise’s contention and argues we should review the juvenile court’s findings only to determine whether they were based on reasonable—not substantial—evidence and without regard for whether the quantum of evidence was clear and convincing.
In Re the Appeal in Pima County Juvenile Dependency Action No. 118537 912 P.2d 1306 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1995
In Re the Appeal in Pima County Juvenile Dependency Action No. 118537 912 P.2d 1306 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1995
Maricopa County Juvenile Action No. J-75m, HI Ariz. 588, Maricopa County Juvenile Action No. JS-M30
In Re the Appeal in Pima County Mental Health Service Action No. MH-1140-6-93. 863 P.2d 284 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1993
In Re the Appeal in Pima County Mental Health Service Action No. MH-1140-6-93. 863 P.2d 284 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1993
Matter of Appeal in Maricopa County Juvenile Action No. JS-4130
In Re the Commitment of an Alleged Mentally Disordered Person MH 91-00558 854 P.2d 1207 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1993
In Re the Commitment of an Alleged Mentally Disordered Person MH 91-00558 854 P.2d 1207 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1993
citing Juvenile Action No. JS-4130, 132 Ariz 486, 488, (regardless of standard of proof that the trier of fact must apply, this court “can only review the evidence to determine if there is substantial evidence to support the conclusion of the trier of fact”).
In Re the Appeal in Maricopa County Juvenile Action No. JS-500274 804 P.2d 730 Ariz. 1990
In Re the Appeal in Maricopa County Juvenile Action No. JS-500274 804 P.2d 730 Ariz. 1990
However, as the court of appeals noted, "the word ‘state’ in the Santosky decision is used both to refer to the party bringing the petition to terminate parental rights and to refer to the judicial system which enters an order of termination.” Matter of Appeal in Maricopa County Juvenile Action No. JS-4130, , 487 n. 1, , 185 n. 1 (App.1982).
In Re the Appeal in Maricopa County Juvenile Action No. JS-6831 748 P.2d 785 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1988
In Re the Appeal in Maricopa County Juvenile Action No. JS-6831 748 P.2d 785 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1988
See Juvenile Appeal No. JS-4374, , Juvenile Appeal No. JS-4130, , Juvenile Appeal No. S-624
In re the Commitment of an Alleged Mentally Disordered Person, MH-1049-3-85 709 P.2d 1372 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1985
In re the Commitment of an Alleged Mentally Disordered Person, MH-1049-3-85 709 P.2d 1372 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1985
Appeal in Maricopa County Juvenile Action No. JS-4130
In Re Maxwell 703 P.2d 574 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1985
In Re Maxwell 703 P.2d 574 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1985
Juvenile Action JS-J4130
In re the Appeal in Pima County Severance Action No. S-1607 708 P.2d 769 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1985
In re the Appeal in Pima County Severance Action No. S-1607 708 P.2d 769 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1985
1388 , 71 L.Ed.2d 599 (1982); Matter of Appeal in Maricopa County, Juvenile Action No. JS-4130
Matter of Appeal in Maricopa County 701 P.2d 1213 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1985
Matter of Appeal in Maricopa County 701 P.2d 1213 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1985
In light of Santosky , Arizona appellate courts declared the “fair preponderance of the evidence” standard contained in the termination statute unconstitutional and required that termination decisions be based upon “clear and convincing evidence.” See Pima County Juvenile Action No. S-919, , Maricopa County Juvenile Action No. JS-4130
Murdock-Bryant Construction, Inc. v. Pearson 703 P.2d 1206 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1984
Murdock-Bryant Construction, Inc. v. Pearson 703 P.2d 1206 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1984
Matter of Appeal in Maricopa County, Etc.
In re the Appeal in Maricopa County Juvenile Action No. JS-4283 653 P.2d 55 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1982
In re the Appeal in Maricopa County Juvenile Action No. JS-4283 653 P.2d 55 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1982
424 , Matter of Appeal in Maricopa County, Juvenile Action No. JS-4130
In Re the Appeal in Maricopa County, Juvenile Action No. JS-3594 653 P.2d 39 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1982
In Re the Appeal in Maricopa County, Juvenile Action No. JS-3594 653 P.2d 39 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1982
See In the Matter of the Appeal in Maricopa County Juvenile Action No. JS-4130
Associated Grocers v. INDUSTRIAL COM'N, ETC. 652 P.2d 160 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1982
Associated Grocers v. INDUSTRIAL COM'N, ETC. 652 P.2d 160 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1982
Therefore, no matter what the burden of proof required in the proceedings below, we can only review the evidence to determine if there is substantial evidence to support the conclusion of the trier of fact.” In Re Appeal in Maricopa County, Juvenile Action
In re the Appeal in Pima County Juvenile Action No. S-983 650 P.2d 484 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1982
In re the Appeal in Pima County Juvenile Action No. S-983 650 P.2d 484 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1982
In the Matter of the Appeal in Maricopa County, Juvenile Action No. JS-4130