Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite In Re the Appeal in Maricopa County Juvenile Action No. JS-4374, 667 P.2d 1345.

58 citing documents.

Chelsea R. v. Dcs, H.R. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
Chelsea R. v. Dcs, H.R. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
Action No. JS-4374, and Maricopa Cty.
Richard M. v. Dcs, T.M. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
Lisa S., Brian W. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
Lisa S., Brian W. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
Juvenile Action No. JS-4374, because that court “is in the best position to weigh the evidence, observe the parties, judge the credibility of witnesses, and resolve disputed facts.” Jordan C. v. Ariz. Dep’t of Econ.
Richard M. v. Dcs, T.M. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
Juvenile Action No. JS-4374
Juana C. v. Dcs, J.C. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
Juana C. v. Dcs, J.C. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
Action No. JS- 4374, and Maricopa Cty.
Quinton v. v. Dcs, A.V. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
Quinton v. v. Dcs, A.V. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
Action No. JS-4374, and Maricopa Cty.
Jeuda K. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
Jeuda K. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
Action No. JS- 4374, and Maricopa Cty.
Rebekah G. v. Katy C. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
Rebekah G. v. Katy C. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
Action No. JS-4374, (holding “the primary predicate” for a finding of abandonment is “whether there has been conduct on the part of the parent which shows a conscious disregard of the obligations which are owed by a parent to a child and which lead to destruction of the parent-child relationship”) (citing Anonymous v. Ano
Jason v. v. Dcs, J.V. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
Jason v. v. Dcs, J.V. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
Action No. JS-4374, and Maricopa Cty.
Joel M. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
Joel M. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
Action No. JS-4374, and Maricopa Cty.
Brenda B. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
Brenda B. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
Action No. JS-4374, and Maricopa Cty.
Vanessa D. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
Vanessa D. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
Action No. JS-4374, and Maricopa Cty.
Mark T. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
Mark T. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
Action No. JS-4374, and Maricopa Cnty.
Victoria G. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
Victoria G. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
Action No. JS-4374, and Maricopa Cnty.
Suzanne S. v. Dcs, F.S. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
Suzanne S. v. Dcs, F.S. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
Action No. JS-4374, and Maricopa Cnty.
Barbara A. v. Dcs, J.W. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
Barbara A. v. Dcs, J.W. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
Action No. JS-4374, and Maricopa Bobby M., ¶ 41 (2005), but Mother does not argue insufficient evidence supports this finding.
Kathy S. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
Kathy S. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
Action No. JS-4374, and Maricopa Cnty.
Manuel W. v. Dcs, M.W. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
Manuel W. v. Dcs, M.W. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
Action No. JS-4374, and Maricopa Cnty.
Victoria F. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
Victoria F. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
Action No. JS- 4374, P.2d 1345 (App. 1983), and Maricopa Cnty.
Department of Child Safety v. Beene 332 P.3d 47 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
Department of Child Safety v. Beene 332 P.3d 47 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
Action No. JS-f37f, , (affirming severance; rejecting mother’s claimed “due process right to confrontation” was denied where her bond restrictions for a Texas homicide charge “forbade her from leaving Texas” to attend a severance trial; stating, in dicta, “that a parent in a termination proceeding does
Audra v. Arizona Department of Economic Security 982 P.2d 1290 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1998
Audra v. Arizona Department of Economic Security 982 P.2d 1290 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1998
Maricopa County Juvenile Action No. JS-4374, , Maricopa County Juvenile Action No. JS-378, 21 Ariz.App.
In re the Appeal in Pima County Juvenile Severance Action No. S-114487 881 P.2d 361 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1993
In re the Appeal in Pima County Juvenile Severance Action No. S-114487 881 P.2d 361 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1993
Maricopa County Juvenile Action No. JS-4374, , modified on other grounds
In Re the Appeal in Maricopa County Juvenile Action No. JS-7499 786 P.2d 1004 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1989
In re the Appeal in Maricopa County Juvenile Action No. JD-500325 788 P.2d 1206 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1989
In re the Appeal in Maricopa County Juvenile Action No. JD-500325 788 P.2d 1206 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1989
Matter of the Appeal in Maricopa County Juvenile Action No. JS-4374
In Re the Appeal in Maricopa County Juvenile Action No. JS-7499 786 P.2d 1004 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1989
this court has twice stated that a parent’s right to due process in termination proceedings includes “a right to confront witnesses where the witnesses’ testimony goes to the heart of the termination proof.” See Matter of the Appeal in Yavapai County Juvenile Action No. J-9365, , Matter of the Appeal in Maricopa County Juvenile Action No. JS-4374
In re the Appeal in Pima County Juvenile Severance Action No. S-2462 785 P.2d 56 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1989
In re the Appeal in Pima County Juvenile Severance Action No. S-2462 785 P.2d 56 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1989
Appeal in Pima County Severance Action S-1607, , Maricopa County Juvenile Action No. JS-4374
In Re the Appeal in Pima County Severance Action No. S-2397 780 P.2d 407 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1989
In Re the Appeal in Pima County Severance Action No. S-2397 780 P.2d 407 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1989
Appeal In Maricopa County Juvenile Action No. JS-4374