Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite In the Appeal in Maricopa County Juvenile Action No. JS-5209 & No. JS-4963, 692 P.2d 1027.

111 citing documents.

In Re Term of Parental Rights as to J.C. 562 P.3d 393 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2024
In Re Term of Parental Rights as to J.C. 562 P.3d 393 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2024
Action No. JS-5209 & No. JS-4963, ).
Jessie D. v. dcs/f v. m.D./m.D./c.D. Ariz. 2021
Jessie D. v. dcs/f v. m.D./m.D./c.D. Ariz. 2021
Action No. JS-5209 & No. JS-4963, (quoting In re Appeal in Maricopa Cnty.
Toni T. v. Dcs, E.T. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
Toni T. v. Dcs, E.T. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
Action No. JS-5209 and No. JS-4963
John O. v. Dcs, A.O. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
John O. v. Dcs, A.O. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
Action No. JS-5209 & No. JS-4963
Yessica R., Efrain R. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
Yessica R., Efrain R. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
Action No. JS-5209 & No. JS-4963, ).
Shad C. v. Dcs, J.C. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
Shad C. v. Dcs, J.C. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
Action No. JS-5209 & No. JS-4963, ), or “undertake rehabilitative measures that are futile,” Mary Ellen C. v. Ariz. Dep’t of Econ.
Matthew J. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
Matthew J. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
Action No. JS-5209 & No. JS-4963, ).
Lisa S., Brian W. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
Lisa S., Brian W. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
d “parental responsibilities” as “capable of being understood by persons of 5 LISA S., BRIAN W. v. DCS, et al. Decision of the Court ordinary intelligence as referring to those duties or obligations which a parent has with regard to his child,” Maricopa County Juvenile Action No. JS- 5209 & No. JS-4963, furthermore, “[t]he term is not intended to encompass any exclusive set of factors but rather to establish a standard which permits a trial judge flexibility in considering the unique circumstanc
Denisse P. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
Denisse P. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
Action No. JS-5209 & No. JS-4963
Mark M. v. Dcs, A.M. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
Mark M. v. Dcs, A.M. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
Action No. JS-5209 & No. JS-4963, ).
Alyssa W. v. Justin G., J.G. 433 P.3d 3 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
Alyssa W. v. Justin G., J.G. 433 P.3d 3 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
Action No. JS-5209 & JS-4963, (App. 5 ALYSSA W. v. JUSTIN G., J.G.
Penny G. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
Penny G. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
Action No. JS-5209 & No. JS- 4963
Ellesse J. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
Ellesse J. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
Action No. JS-5209 & No. JS-4963, ).
Philip P., Katherine J. v. Dcs, V.P. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
Philip P., Katherine J. v. Dcs, V.P. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
Action No. JS-5209 and No. JS-4963, ).
Cassandra W., Michael S. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
Cassandra W., Michael S. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
Action No. JS-5209 and JS-4963
Forrest C. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
Joseph W. v. Dcs, C.W. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
Forrest C. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
Action No. JS-5209 and No. JS-4963, ).
Joseph W. v. Dcs, C.W. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
Action No. JS-5209 & No. JS-4963
Kathy S. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
Kathy S. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
Action No. JS-5209 and No. JS-4963, ).
Jarrid W. v. Dcs, E.W. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
Jarrid W. v. Dcs, E.W. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
Action JS-5209, JS-4963, ).
Teresa F. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
Teresa F. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
Action No. JS-5209 and No. JS-4963, ).
Manuel W. v. Dcs, M.W. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
Manuel W. v. Dcs, M.W. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
Action No. JS-5209 and No. JS-4963, ).
Christina G. v. Arizona Department of Economic Security 256 P.3d 628 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2011
Christina G. v. Arizona Department of Economic Security 256 P.3d 628 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2011
Action No. JS-5209 & No. JS-J/.963, , (recognizing the duty of ADES to attempt to preserve the family does not go so far as to “require it to undertake efforts which are futile”).
Raymond F. v. Arizona Department of Economic Security 231 P.3d 377 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2010
Raymond F. v. Arizona Department of Economic Security 231 P.3d 377 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2010
¶ 20 “[T]he terra ‘parental responsibilities’ is capable of being understood by persons of ordinary intelligence as referring to those duties or obligations which a parent has with regard to his child.” JS-5894, 145 Ariz. at 408-09 , 701 P.2d at 1213 -14 (citing Maricopa County JS-5209, JS-4963, , ).
Jordan C. v. Arizona Department of Economic Security 219 P.3d 296 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2009
Jordan C. , Jesse C., Kailynn C., Michele C. v. Ades Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2009
Jordan C. , Jesse C., Kailynn C., Michele C. v. Ades Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2009
Action Nos. JS-5209 and JS-4963, 143 Ariz. 178, 187, (finding stress of parenting additional children would exacerbate mother’s mental illness).
Jordan C. v. Arizona Department of Economic Security 219 P.3d 296 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2009
Action Nos. JS-5209 and JS-4963, , (finding stress of parenting additional children would exacerbate mother’s mental illness).