Cited by
Opinions in Arizona that cite In re the Appeal in Maricopa County Juvenile Action No. JS-5609, 720 P.2d 548.
- Timothy B. v. dcs/h.B. Ariz. 2022
-
Timothy B. v. dcs/h.B.
Ariz. 2022
¶7 In considering the length-of-sentence ground, the court relied on In re Appeal in Maricopa County Juvenile Action No. JS-5609, which found that “[t]he ‘normal home’ referred to in the statute relates to [an incarcerated parent’s] obligation to provide a normal home, a home in which the [incarcerated parent] has a presence, and it does not refer to a ‘normal home’ environment created by [others].” The court also considered no
- Bernardino v. Dcs, J.P. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
-
Bernardino v. Dcs, J.P.
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
Action No. JS-5609, ); but see Timothy B. v. Dep’t of Child Safety, ¶ 19 (App. 2020) (suggesting a broader definition of the term “normal home” might be appropriate in some cases).
- Jessie D. v. dcs/f v. m.D./m.D./c.D. Ariz. 2021
- Jessie D. v. dcs/f v. m.D./m.D./c.D. Ariz. 2021
- Steven H. v. Dcs, M.H. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
- Steven H. v. Dcs, M.H. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
- Timothy B., Michael M. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
-
Timothy B., Michael M. v. Dcs
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
In that regard, we hold that, on this record, the juvenile court erred in strictly applying a narrow concept of “normal home” as outlined in an earlier decision of this court, Maricopa County Juvenile Action No. JS-5609
- Charles v. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
- Charles v. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
- Matthew C. v. Dcs, M.C. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
-
Matthew C. v. Dcs, M.C.
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
Juvenile Action No. JS-5609, ).
- Trung N. v. Dcs, J.C. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
- Trung N. v. Dcs, J.C. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
- Travis H. v. Dcs, A.H. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
- Travis H. v. Dcs, A.H. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
- Patrick F. v. Dcs, A.S. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
-
Patrick F. v. Dcs, A.S.
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
Juvenile Action No. JS-5609, (explaining that the “normal home” referred to in A.R.S.
- Mark T. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
- James M. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
- Mark T. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
-
James M. v. Dcs
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
Action No. JS-5609, (defining a “normal home” as “a home in which the respondent natural father has a presence”).
- Jeffrey P. v. Department of Child Safety 368 P.3d 312 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
- Douglas F. v. Dcs, S.R. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
- Douglas F. v. Dcs, S.R. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
- Ashlyn H. v. Dcs, A.O. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
-
Ashlyn H. v. Dcs, A.O.
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
Action No. JS-5609, (noting “normal home” refers to the parent’s own obligation to provide a normal home in which he maintains a presence).
- Jason B. v. Dcs, S.B. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
-
Jason B. v. Dcs, S.B.
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
Juvenile Action No. JS-5609
- Jesus M. v. Arizona Department of Economic Security 53 P.3d 203 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2002
-
Jesus M. v. Arizona Department of Economic Security
53 P.3d 203
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2002
See In re Maricopa County Juvenile Action No. JS-5609
- Michael J. v. Arizona Department of Economic Security 979 P.2d 1024 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1999
-
Michael J. v. Arizona Department of Economic Security
979 P.2d 1024
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1999
§ 8-533(A) and (B)(4).” Maricopa County Juvenile Action No. JS-5609
- James S. v. Arizona Department of Economic Security 972 P.2d 684 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1998
-
James S. v. Arizona Department of Economic Security
972 P.2d 684
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1998
Maricopa County Juvenile Action No. JS-5609, , ("whether respondent may or may not make parole is irrelevant”).
- In re the Appeal in Maricopa County 904 P.2d 1279 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1995
-
In re the Appeal in Maricopa County
904 P.2d 1279
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1995
Perhaps the closest case to the present one is Maricopa County Juvenile Action No. JS-5609, , which affirmed severance of parental rights of a father sentenced to a nine year prison term following his brutal sexual assault of a senior citizen.
- In re the Appeal in Pima County Juvenile Severance Action No. S-2462 785 P.2d 56 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1989
-
In re the Appeal in Pima County Juvenile Severance Action No. S-2462
785 P.2d 56
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1989
See In the Matter of the Appeal in Maricopa *539 County Juvenile Action No. JS-5609