Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite Mara M. v. Arizona Department of Economic Security, 38 P.3d 41.

30 citing documents.

In Re Term of Parental Rights as to S.S. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2025
In Re Term of Parental Rights as to S.S. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2025
In Re Termination of Parental Rights as to A.A. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2024
In Re Termination of Parental Rights as to A.A. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2024
Maria v. v. Dcs, Z.G. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
Maria v. v. Dcs, Z.G. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
Logan B. v. Dcs 422 P.3d 1072 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
Logan B. v. Dcs 422 P.3d 1072 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
Sec., ¶ 24 (App. 2002) (citing Santosky v. Kramer, 455 U.S. 745, 753 (1982)); Troxel v. Granville, 530 U.S. 57, 66 (2000).
Crystal F. v. Dcs, L.S. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
Crystal F. v. Dcs, L.S. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
Patrick G. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
Patrick G. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
Sec., ¶ 24 (App. 2002)), we choose to address the merits of Father’s argument.
Marianne N. v. dcs/o.N./i.T./a.G. Ariz. 2017
Marianne N. v. dcs/o.N./i.T./a.G. Ariz. 2017
Sec., -06 ¶ 16 (App. 2002).
Martha C. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
Martha C. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
Sec., ¶ 28 (App. 2002) (concluding that although “service of process on counsel .
Gutierrez v. Hon. fox/kivlighn 394 P.3d 1096 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
Gutierrez v. Hon. fox/kivlighn 394 P.3d 1096 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
¶ 15 (App. 5 Both Mother and Father analyzed the factors of § 25-403(A) in their pretrial statements filed prior to the temporary orders hearing.
Jurnee H. v. Dcs, N.M. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
Jurnee H. v. Dcs, N.M. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
Shiloh Z. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
Shiloh Z. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
Sec., -08, ¶¶ 25-28 (App. 2002) (concluding service on counsel was reasonably calculated to apprise a parent of dependency proceedings where parent had not been in contact with counsel or DCS for several months).
Lisa K. v. Arizona Department of Economic Security 281 P.3d 1041 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2012
Lisa K. v. Arizona Department of Economic Security 281 P.3d 1041 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2012
Sec., citing Santosky v. Kramer, 455 U.S. 745, 753 (1982) (citation omitted).
Kimu P. v. Arizona Department of Economic Security 178 P.3d 511 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2008
Kimu P. v. Arizona Department of Economic Security 178 P.3d 511 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2008
Sec., -06, ¶¶ 16-17 , -44 (App.2002); 1997 Ariz. Sess.
Christy A. v. Arizona Department of Economic Security 173 P.3d 463 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2007
Christy A. v. Arizona Department of Economic Security 173 P.3d 463 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2007
Sec., ¶ 24 , (citing Santosky v. Kramer, 455 U.S. 745, 753 , 102 S.Ct.
Veronica T. v. Arizona Department of Economic Security 126 P.3d 154 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2005
Veronica T. v. Arizona Department of Economic Security 126 P.3d 154 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2005