Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite In Re Niky R., 55 P.3d 81.

38 citing documents.

In Re Delinquency of E.L. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2026
In Re Delinquency of E.L. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2026
In Re Delinquency of D.C. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2025
In Re Delinquency of D.C. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2025
¶ 10 (App. 2002); ¶ 4 (App. 2009) (“A trial court abuses its discretion if it misapplies the law or exercises its discretion based on incorrect legal principles.”).
In Re Ruben P. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
In Re Ruben P. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
¶ 12 (App. 2002) (citation omitted); (“[J]udges ‘are presumed to know the law and to apply it in making their decisions.’”) (citation omitted).
In Re Damian T. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
In Re Damian T. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
In Re Priscila O. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
In Re Priscila O. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
In Re Thomas D. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
In Re Thomas D. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
In Re Isaiah A. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
In Re Isaiah A. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
In Re Christian S. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
In Re Christian S. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
DISCUSSION ¶5 “The juvenile court has broad discretion to determine an appropriate disposition for a delinquent juvenile.” ¶ 10 (App. 2002) ( ¶ 7 (App. 1999)).
In Re Dominic C. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
In Re Dominic C. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
¶ 10 (App. 2002) (citation omitted).
In Re Eliodoro M. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
In Re Eliodoro M. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
“The juvenile court has broad discretion to determine an appropriate disposition for a delinquent juvenile.” ¶ 10 (App. 2002).
In Re Tien F. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
In Re Tien F. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
DISCUSSION ¶8 “The juvenile court has broad discretion to determine an appropriate disposition for a delinquent juvenile.” ¶ 10 (App. 2002) ( ¶ 7 (App. 1999)).
In Re Jelohera J. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
In Re Jelohera J. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
¶ 21 (App. 2002) (“We assume that judges follow and apply the law” and therefore presume the trial court “made every finding necessary to support the judgment.”) (quoting Maricopa Cty.
In Re Richard C. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
In Re Richard C. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
The juvenile court has broad discretion to determine the proper disposition for a juvenile it adjudicates delinquent, ¶ 7 (App. 1999), and we will not overturn the court’s commitment order absent an abuse of that discretion, ¶ 10 (App. 2002).
In Re Nicholas L. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
In Re Nicholas L. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
In Re Justice M. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
In Re Justice M. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
§ 8-341.01(A) (disposition order for participation in residential treatment program must be supported by psychological evaluation); ¶ 4, (rehabilitation is the purpose of disposition after adjudication of delinquency); ¶ 21, (where not explicitly stated, we presume juvenile court implicitly made findings necessary to justify disposition order).
In Re Skyler H. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
In Re Skyler H. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
In Re Fernando R. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
In Re Fernando R. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
STANDARD OF REVIEW ¶8 “The juvenile court has broad discretion to determine an appropriate disposition for a delinquent juvenile” and “[w]e will not alter that disposition absent an abuse of discretion.” ¶ 10
In re Amber S. 238 P.3d 632 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2010
In re Amber S. 238 P.3d 632 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2010
A Tumbling-T Ranches v. Flood Control District 204 P.3d 1051 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2008
A Tumbling-T Ranches v. Flood Control District 204 P.3d 1051 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2008