Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite Mary Lou C. v. Arizona Department of Economic Security, 83 P.3d 43.

881 citing documents.

Michael A. v. Elizabeth G., M.A. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
Salynda H., Paul T. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
Salynda H., Paul T. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
Sec., ¶¶ 14-15 (App. 2004) (requiring diligent reunification efforts when termination is based upon the 3 Absent material changes from the relevant date, we cite the current version of rules and statutes.
Rodney L., Deana L. v. Dcs, J.L. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
Rodney L., Deana L. v. Dcs, J.L. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
Faith P. v. Dcs, L.E. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
Faith P. v. Dcs, L.E. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
Sec., ¶ 8 (App. 2004), and Denise R., 221 Ariz. at 94-95, ¶¶ 9-10).
Destiny F. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
Destiny F. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
Yessica R., Efrain R. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
Yessica R., Efrain R. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
Sec., ¶ 8 (App. 2004), and Denise R. v. Ariz. Dep’t of Econ.
Shad C. v. Dcs, J.C. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
Shad C. v. Dcs, J.C. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
Selina Z. v. Dcs, D.Z. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
Selina Z. v. Dcs, D.Z. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
Shaquita H. v. Dcs, A.B. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
Shaquita H. v. Dcs, A.B. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
Ricky G. v. Priscilla G., A.G. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
Ricky G. v. Priscilla G., A.G. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
Melissa C. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
Samantha J. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
Serah E. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
Melissa C. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
Samantha J. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
Sec., ¶ 19 (App. 2004) (“The best interest requirement may be met if .
Serah E. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
Jessie D. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
Krystle M. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
Krystle M. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
Jessie D. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
Darrell S. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
Darrell S. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
Rachael A. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
Rachael A. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
Marcellina D. v. Dcs, A.D. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
Marcellina D. v. Dcs, A.D. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
Matthew J. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
Christopher H. v. Dcs, M.H. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
Matthew J. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
Christopher H. v. Dcs, M.H. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
Desiree A., Donovan J. v. Dcs, D.A. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
Desiree A., Donovan J. v. Dcs, D.A. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
Sec., ¶ 15 (App. 2004) (citation omitted), means DCS must provide parents “with the time and opportunity to participate in programs designed to improve the parent’s ability to care for the child;” it does not require that DCS provide “every conceivable service” or “undertake rehabilitative measures that are futile,” Mar
Mario G. v. Dcs, E.G. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
Mario G. v. Dcs, E.G. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
Paule C. v. Dcs, J.H. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
Paule C. v. Dcs, J.H. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
State v. Bergen Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
Daniel S. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
State v. Bergen Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
Daniel S. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
Lourdes R. v. Robert O., A.O. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019