Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite Monica C. v. Arizona Department of Economic Security, 118 P.3d 37.

95 citing documents.

Jimmy B. v. Dcs, R.B. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
Jimmy B. v. Dcs, R.B. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
Sec., ¶ 16 (App. 2005) (quotation and citation omitted).
Melissa D. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
Melissa D. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
Tyren T., Brittany H. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
Tyren T., Brittany H. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
Sec., ¶ 22 (App. 2005) (citations omitted).
Kelly M. v. Karen K., Peter K., B.L. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
Kelly M. v. Karen K., Peter K., B.L. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
Carlos O. v. Dcs, C.B. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
Carlos O. v. Dcs, C.B. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
Sec., ¶ 23, (applying “doctrine of fundamental error” to constitutional claim not raised in juvenile court).
Jose N. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
Jose N. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
Enrico G. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
Enrico G. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
Sec., ¶ 22, (holding that failure to object to an issue in the juvenile court preserves review for fundamental error only).
Ashlee W. v. Dcs, E.S. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
Ashlee W. v. Dcs, E.S. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
Louis C. v. Department of Child Safety 353 P.3d 364 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2015
Louis C. v. Department of Child Safety 353 P.3d 364 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2015
Cherlle S. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
Cherlle S. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
Sec., ¶ 22, (failure to object in trial court triggers fundamental error review on appeal).
Sherri C. v. Dcs, T.O. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
Sherri C. v. Dcs, T.O. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
Sec., ¶ 22, (applying fundamental error review when party did not object to noncompliance with juvenile court rules of procedure).
Stevens v. Yohannes Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
Stevens v. Yohannes Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
Sec., ¶ 24, (citation omitted).
Angel O. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
Angel O. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
Sec., ¶ 22, ¶¶ 17-18, ; 858, P.2d 1152, 1191 (1993) (when objections were raised in the family court, the harmless error standard is applied).
Ruben M. v. Arizona Department of Economic Security 282 P.3d 437 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2012
Ruben M. v. Arizona Department of Economic Security 282 P.3d 437 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2012
Sec., ¶ 23 , (quoting Bradshaw v. State Farm Mut.
Lisa K. v. Arizona Department of Economic Security 281 P.3d 1041 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2012
Lisa K. v. Arizona Department of Economic Security 281 P.3d 1041 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2012
Sec., n.9, n.9 (2004) (“‘[O]pening briefs must present significant arguments, supported by authority, setting forth an
Christina G. v. Arizona Department of Economic Security 256 P.3d 628 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2011
Christina G. v. Arizona Department of Economic Security 256 P.3d 628 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2011
State v. Escobedo 213 P.3d 689 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2009
State v. Escobedo 213 P.3d 689 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2009
Sec., ¶ 22 , (“Because noncompliance with the rules does not mandate reversal, noncompliance cannot be termed structural error.”).
State v. Freeney 207 P.3d 688 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2009
Manuel M. v. Ades, Leila M., Alayena M. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2008
Manuel M. v. Ades, Leila M., Alayena M. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2008
Sec., (general notice that parent’s failure to appear might lead to waiver of legal rights insufficient to The “trial” to which a parent is entitled is the termination adjudication hearing, “an 10 adjudicatory hearing in which the court determines whether the moving pa
John M. v. Ades, Shannon M. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2007
John M. v. Ades, Shannon M. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2007
Sec., (failure to provide parent notice of right to jury trial in severance proceeding not fundamental error where parent presented no evidence that jury would have decided case differently).
Arizona Department of Economic Security v. Reinstein 150 P.3d 782 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2007
Arizona Department of Economic Security v. Reinstein 150 P.3d 782 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2007
Sec., ¶ 17, (“Neither the Arizona Constitution nor the federal constitution requires a jury trial for severance proceedings, although some states (including Arizona) have made that provision on a statutory basis.” (citation omitted)); see also John C., 208 Ariz. at 46 -47 ¶ 11, 90 P.3d at 783-
Kelly R. v. Arizona Department of Economic Security 137 P.3d 973 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2006
Kelly R. v. Arizona Department of Economic Security 137 P.3d 973 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2006
Lindsey M. v. Rizona Department of Economic Security 127 P.3d 59 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2006
Lindsey M. v. Rizona Department of Economic Security 127 P.3d 59 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2006