Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite LINDA v. v. ARIZONA DEPT. OF ECONOMIC SEC., 117 P.3d 795.

48 citing documents.

In Re Termination of Parental Rights as to M.P. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2025
Sec., n.3 (App. 2005), overruled in part by Sandra R., ¶¶ 15-17.
In Re Term of Parental Rights as to D.L. and A.L. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2024
“[I]f a parent neglects or abuses a child, the court may terminate that parent’s rights to their other children on this basis, even if there is no evidence that the other children were harmed.” See Sandra R. v. Dep’t of Child Safety, ¶ 13 (2020) (citing Linda V. v. Ariz. Dep’t of Econ Sec., ¶ 14 (App. 2005)).
Susan M. v. Dcs, E.M. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
Sandra R./sergio C. v. dcs/m.R./f.M./j.M. Ariz. 2020
Sandra R./sergio C. v. dcs/m.R./f.M./j.M. Ariz. 2020
or knew or reasonably should have known that the other parent abused her “as she was in their sole care when she suffered life-threatening injuries.” Applying the “constitutional nexus” the juvenile court found a significant nexus existed between J.M.’s abuse and the risk of abuse to J.M.’s siblings.
Abel v. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
Sec., ¶ 6 (App. 2005) (citations omitted).
Shawna N., John N. v. Dcs, H.N. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
Sec., ¶ 6 (App. 2005) (citations omitted).
Sharece N. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
Sec., ¶ 14 (App. 2005) (“[W]e hold that § 8-533(B)(2) can mean that parents .
Sandra R,, Sergio C. v. Dcs 436 P.3d 503 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
entific articles without meeting the foundation requirements of Arizona Rule of Evidence 803(18); (2) sufficient evidence supports the abuse finding related to the shaken-baby injury (nonaccidental trauma) even though the evidence did not prove which parent abused the child; and (3) the “constitutional nexus” is considered under the totality of the circumstances in determining whether termination is in the best interests of the child.
Alyssa W. v. Justin G., J.G. 433 P.3d 3 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
Nicholios N. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
Tina v. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
Seth M. v. Arienne M. 426 P.3d 1224 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
Sec., ¶ 10 (App. 2005) (“We first note that the phrase ‘a child’ contained in § 8-533(B)(2) is ambiguous because it is readily capable of vastly different interpretations.”).
Brumley v. Brumley Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
Sec., ¶ 14 (App. 2005), she offered no evidence below that J.B.
Tabitha S. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
Sec., ¶ 14 (App. 2005)).
Alma S. v. Dep't of Child Safety 418 P.3d 925 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
79, ¶ 14, , 798 (App. 2005) (holding that it is not necessary that the child be abused only that a child be abused).
Ryan H. v. Dcs, B.H. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
Joel D. v. Dcs, A.D. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
Sec., ¶ 6 (App. 2005) (citations omitted).
Crystal E. v. Department of Child Safety 390 P.3d 1222 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
Jeremy M. v. Dcs, J.J. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
Anthony E. v. Dcs, A.E. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
Guthrie S. v. Dcs, A.S. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
Mandy P. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
Jean K. v. Jeremy M., J.K. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
Sec., ¶ 6, 2 Additionally, the juvenile court must find by a preponderance of the evidence that the termination is in the best interests of the child.
Cynthia G. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
Patrick F. v. Dcs, A.S. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
Sec., ¶ 6 (App. 2005) (citation omitted).
Joseph W. v. Dcs, C.W. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
Mohammad K. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
Lali v. v. Dcs, A.C. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
Michelle H. v. Dcs, J.S. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
Chantelle L. v. Dcs, C.W. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
Adrian E. v. Department of Child Safety 369 P.3d 264 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2016
Frank R. v. Mother Goose Adoptions 367 P.3d 88 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2016
Sec., , , 797 (App.2005).
Jose N. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
Jared M., Amber M. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
Samantha M., Nykkolas S. v. Dcs, K.S. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
Angela E. v. Dcs, R.M. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
Sec., ¶ 6 (App. 2005) (punctuation omitted).
Tamarra P. v. Dcs, M.B. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
Mary B., Christopher W. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
Manuel M. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
Juan P. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
Tina T. v. Department of Child Safety 339 P.3d 1040 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
In Re Eric W. 271 P.3d 486 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2012
Sec., ¶ 7 , , 797 (App.2005)).
Mario G. v. Arizona Department of Economic Security 257 P.3d 1162 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2011
Sec., ¶ 6 , , 797 (App.2005) (citations omitted).
Andrew R. v. Arizona Department of Economic Security 224 P.3d 950 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2010
Andrew R. v. Arizona Department of Economic Security 224 P.3d 950 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2010
Sea, ¶ 7 , , 797 (App.2005).
Kimu P. v. Arizona Department of Economic Security 178 P.3d 511 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2008
See., ¶ 7 , , 797 (App.2005).
In Re Hyrum H. 131 P.3d 1058 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2006
Sec., ¶ 7 , , 797 (App.2005).