Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite Christy C. v. Arizona Department of Economic Security, 153 P.3d 1074.

263 citing documents.

Trevor H., Jamie W. v. Dcs, L.H. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
Sec., ¶ 12, (citation omitted), and establishes that termination is in the best interests of the child, by a preponderance of the evidence.
Tabatha T. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
Tabatha T. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
Sec., ¶ 21, (waiver is particularly appropriate “as it relates to the alleged lack of detail in the juvenile court’s findings” because “a party may not ‘sit back and not call the [juvenile] court’s attention to the lack of a specific finding on a critical issue, and then urge on appeal
Frank G., Annette G. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
Frank G., Annette G. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
Sec., ¶ 21, (litigant waived appellate argument that trial court erred by not making individualized findings because such findings were not requested at trial).
Marlon R. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
Marlon R. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
Sec., ¶ 12 (App. 2007), and “we view the evidence and reasonable inferences to be drawn from it in the light most favorable to sustaining the court’s decision,” Jordan C. v. Ariz. Dep't of Econ.
Robert P. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
Robert P. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
Sec., ¶ 12, and demonstrates that termination is in the best interests of the child by a preponderance of the evidence, Matthew L., 223 Ariz. at 549, ¶ 7, 225 P.3d at 606 (citation omitted).
David H. v. Dcs, T.H. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
Richard G. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
Richard G. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
Sec., ¶ 12 (App. 2007) (citation omitted).
David H. v. Dcs, T.H. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
Sec., ¶ 12 (App. 2007) (citing Jesus M. v. Ariz. Dep’t of Econ.
Jon D., Kristie W. v. Dcs, C.W. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
Jon D., Kristie W. v. Dcs, C.W. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
Yhossiris v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
Yhossiris v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
Sec., ¶ 12, and a preponderance of the evidence demonstrates that termination is in the best interests of the child, Matthew L., 223 Ariz. at 549, ¶ 7, 225 P.3d at 606 (citation omitted).
Teresa F. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
Teresa F. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
Sec., ¶¶ 20-21 (App. 2007) (holding objections raised for the first time on appeal are waived) ( ).
Enrico G. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
Enrico G. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
Sec., ¶ 21, (holding that issues cannot be raised for the first time on appeal).
Douglas F. v. Dcs, S.R. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
Douglas F. v. Dcs, S.R. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
Guy N. v. Dcs, B.N. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
Vanessa T. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
Guy N. v. Dcs, B.N. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
Sec., ¶ 12, (citation omitted).
Vanessa T. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
Cherlle S. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
Cherlle S. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
Jerry P. v. Dcs, A.P. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
Jerry P. v. Dcs, A.P. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
Sec., ¶ 12, (citation omitted).
Ashlyn H. v. Dcs, A.O. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
Ashlyn H. v. Dcs, A.O. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
Sec., ¶ 12, (citing Jesus M. v. Ariz. Dep’t of Econ.
Johnny L. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
Johnny L. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
Sec., ¶ 21, (holding that parent waived argument that juvenile court failed to make individualized findings as to the grounds for termination by failing to object in juvenile court).
Joslin G. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
Victoria F. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
Joslin G. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
Sec., ¶ 12, see also Jesus M. v. Ariz. Dep’t of Econ.
Victoria F. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
Sec., ¶ 12, (citing Jesus M. v. Ariz. Dep’t of Econ.
Candra H. v. Dcs, C.H. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
Candra H. v. Dcs, C.H. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
Sec., - 52, ¶ 19, -81 (App. 2007).
Shawna S. v. Dcs, R.G. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
Shawna S. v. Dcs, R.G. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
Jason B. v. Dcs, S.B. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
Jason B. v. Dcs, S.B. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
Sec., -52, ¶ 19, -81 (App. 2007) (holding express findings on Michael J. factors are not required).
Raegina M. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
Raegina M. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
Sec., ¶ 21, (“We generally do not consider objections raised for the first time on appeal.
Arizona Department of Economic Security v. Rocky J. 323 P.3d 720 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
Arizona Department of Economic Security v. Rocky J. 323 P.3d 720 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
Sec., ¶ 12, and a preponderance of the evidence shows that termination is in the child’s best interest, Father argues that ADES’s September 21, 2013, notice of appeal divested the juvenile court of jurisdiction to consider ADES’s motion for re
Shawanee S. v. Arizona Department of Economic Security 319 P.3d 236 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014