Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite Christy A. v. Arizona Department of Economic Security, 173 P.3d 463.

181 citing documents.

Michael T. v. Dcs, J.E. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
Michael T. v. Dcs, J.E. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
Sec., ¶ 14, (“[T]he juvenile court has engrafted the concept of ‘default’ .
Nicole M. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
Nicole M. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
Sec., ¶¶ 13-14 (App. 2007).
Martha C. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
Martha C. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
Sec., ¶ 12 (App. 2007) (motion to set aside).
Brenda D. v. Department of Child Safety 393 P.3d 930 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
Brenda D. v. Department of Child Safety 393 P.3d 930 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
§ 8-863(C); see also § 8-537(C) ( , ).
Lilian G. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
Lilian G. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
Bryan B. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
Bryan B. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
Sec., ¶¶ 13-14 (App. 2007).
Marwa M. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
Marwa M. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
Vanessa D. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
Vanessa D. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
Marianne N. v. Department of Child Safety 381 P.3d 264 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
Marianne N. v. Department of Child Safety 381 P.3d 264 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
Sec., ¶ 14 (App. 2007) (advising that juvenile courts should not use “default terminology” when a parent fails to appear, but should consider “whether the parent can show ‘good cause’ .
John D. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
John D. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
Sec., & n.11, ¶¶ 15-16 (App. 2007).1 We review the juvenile court’s determination regarding good cause and the denial of a motion to set aside a termination order for an abuse of discretion.
Ashlee C. v. Dcs, A.T. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
Ashlee C. v. Dcs, A.T. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
William P. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
William P. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
Sec., –05, ¶ 16 (App. 2007) (internal quotations and citations omitted).
Shiloh Z. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
Shiloh Z. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
Marc S. v. Robyn P./william P. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
Marc S. v. Robyn P./william P. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
Danielle J. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
Danielle J. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
To prevail on the motion, Mother was required to “show that (1) mistake, inadvertence, surprise or excusable neglect exists [for her failure to appear as directed] and (2) a meritorious defense to the claims [in the motion to terminate] exists.” Christy A. v. Ariz. Dep’t of Econ Sec., ¶ 16 (App. 2007).
Kelly M. v. Karen K., Peter K., B.L. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
Kelly M. v. Karen K., Peter K., B.L. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
Sec., ¶¶ 13-14 (App. 2007) (holding that if a party has proper notice and warning of a failure to appear, and does not show good cause for failing to appear, the court may consider whether such 5 Kelly also argues, citing Roberto F. v. Dep’t. of Child Safety, ¶ 22 (App. 2014), that the juv
Stacey M. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
Stacey M. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
Sec., ¶ 14, (juvenile courts should not use “default” terminology when a parent fails to appear, but should consider “whether the parent can show ‘good cause’ .
Danica F. v. Dcs, G.Y. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
Danica F. v. Dcs, G.Y. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
Fitch v. Fitch Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
Fitch v. Fitch Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
Christy A. v. Ariz. Dep’t. of Econ Sec., ¶ 19 (App. 2007), citing Richas v. Super.
Tutora v. Dominguez Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
Tutora v. Dominguez Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
Sec., ¶ 31, (citation omitted).
Shanna M. v. Dcs, P.M. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
Shanna M. v. Dcs, P.M. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
Allen C. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
Allen C. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
Enrico G. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
Enrico G. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
4 ENRICO G. v. DCS, et al. Decision of the Court consistent with this court’s P.3d 463 (App. 2007).8 ¶8 On February 19, 2015, Father filed a “Motion to Set Aside Default Judgment and Termination of Parental Rights” in both cases, arguing his good cause for not attending the December 11, 2014 hearing was that he was “suffering from a psychotic break, and was unable to make any
Ashlee W. v. Dcs, E.S. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
Ashlee W. v. Dcs, E.S. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
Tanya N. v. Dcs, M.N. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
Tanya N. v. Dcs, M.N. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015