Cited by

Sec., ¶ 29 (App. 2010) (citation omitted).

Sec., –77, ¶¶ 14–15 (App. 2010).

Sec., ¶ 15 (App. 2010).5 ¶19 Mother concedes that she “has a history of substance use” and “[l]ike many Americans, [she] uses legal substances, such as marijuana and alcohol,” but argues that the superior court erred in finding substance abuse prevented her from discharging her parental responsibilities bec

Sec., ¶ 16 (App. 2010)).

See Jennifer S., 240 Ariz. at 287–88, ¶¶ 17–18, 21, 25 (citing "decades-long history of substance abuse," drug use "during the dependency," and parent's "refus[al] to take most of her required drug tests" in affirming termination on the chronic-substance-abuse ground); ¶¶ 27, 29 (App. 2010) (noting parent's history of drug use, positive tests, and "a two-month period in which he did not submit to 5 IN RE TERM OF PARENTAL RIGHTS AS TO B.A.

Sec., -79, ¶¶ 26-29 (App. 2010); -48 n.3 (1971) (“[I]t is reasonable to infer that a refusal to take [a breathalyzer] test indicates the defendant’s fear of the results of the test and his consciousness of guilt.”) (citation and internal quotation marks omitted).

Sec., ¶ 29 (App. 2010) (finding that “temporary abstinence from drugs and alcohol does not outweigh .

Sec., ¶ 16 (App. 2010) (emphasis added).

Sec., ¶ 15 (App. 2010); A.R.S.

Sec., ¶ 19 (App. 2010) (citation and internal quotation marks omitted).

Sec., ¶ 29 (App. 2010) (“Father’s temporary abstinence from drugs and alcohol does not outweigh his significant history of abuse or his consistent inability to abstain during this case.”); see also Jennifer S. v. Dep’t of Child Safety, ¶ 25 (App. 2016) (“Although Mother made efforts to achieve and

Sec., ¶ 27 (App. 2010) (noting parent’s failure to submit to drug testing for two months among evidence of ongoing substance abuse).

Sec., ¶ 25 (App. 2010) (“[C]hildren should not be forced to wait for their parent to grow up.” (quotation omitted)).

Sec., ¶ 16 (App. 2010) (noting substance abuse need not be constant to be considered chronic).

Sec., ¶¶ 20-22 (App. 2010) (finding the parent was unable to discharge his parental responsibilities where he did not make appropriate decisions, protect his children, or provide his 4 MARTHA C. v. DCS, T.F.

Sec., ¶ 25 (App. 2010) (citation omitted).