Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite Raymond F. v. Arizona Department of Economic Security, 231 P.3d 377.

409 citing documents.

Nicholios N. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
Sec., ¶ 30 (App. 2010) (relevant factors in a best-interest determination include whether existing placement is meeting the child’s needs, whether 8 NICHOLIOS N. v. DCS, et al. Decision of the Court the child is adoptable, and
Tina v. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
Tina v. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
Sec., ¶ 30 (App. 2010); Christina G. v. Ariz. Dep’t of Econ.
Justin M., Stephanie R. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
Justin M., Stephanie R. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
Sec., ¶ 30 (App. 2010) (affirmative benefits include availability of adoptive placement, whether placement is meeting child’s needs, and whether children are adoptable).
Martina M. v. Dcs, A.M. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
Martina M. v. Dcs, A.M. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
Timothy W. v. Dcs, T.W. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
Timothy W. v. Dcs, T.W. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
Kyle J. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
Kyle J. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
and there are reasonable grounds to believe that the condition will continue for a prolonged indeterminate period.” Chronic substance abuse is long-lasting, but “need not be constant.” ¶ 16 (App. 2010).
Stephanie M. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
Stephanie M. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
Megan M. v. Matthew M. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
Megan M. v. Matthew M. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
Summyr K. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
Larrissa P. v. Dcs, J.H. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
Summyr K. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
Larrissa P. v. Dcs, J.H. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
Sec., -80 ¶¶ 30-33 (App. 2010).
Johanna M. v. Dcs, Y.L. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
Johanna M. v. Dcs, Y.L. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
Tara M. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
Tara M. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
Breyana M. v. Dcs, J.V. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
Breyana M. v. Dcs, J.V. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
Samantha D. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
Samantha D. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
Gabriella L v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
Gabriella L v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
Sec., ¶ 30 (App. 2010) (affirmative benefits include availability of adoptive placement, whether placement is meeting child’s needs, whether children are adoptable).
Brittany P., Andres G. v. Dcs, N.G. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
Brittany P., Andres G. v. Dcs, N.G. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
Joseph C. v. Dcs, J.C. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
Joseph C. v. Dcs, J.C. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
Jeuda K. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
C.D. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
C.D. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
Jeuda K. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
Sec., ¶ 15 (App. 2010) (citing A.R.S.
Angelina D. v. Dcs, D.B. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
Angelina D. v. Dcs, D.B. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
Eric R. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
Eric R. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
Janice H. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
Janice H. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
Matthew D. v. Dcs, L.D. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
Matthew D. v. Dcs, L.D. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
Shannon S. v. Dcs, A.S. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
Shannon S. v. Dcs, A.S. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
Tabitha S. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
Tabitha S. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
Tomi M. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017