DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite Bob H. v. Arizona Dept. of Economic SEC., 237 P.3d 632.

55 citing documents.

  • Fisher v. Finch Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2026
    Sec., ¶ 19 (App. 2010) (affirming termination of parental rights when hearing was conducted in parents’ absence because they failed to appear); Smith v. Smith, No. 1 CA-CV 25-0696 FC, 2026 WL 796940 at *2, ¶ 9 (Ariz. App. Mar.
  • Jacob G. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
  • Jacob G. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
  • Tracy D. , Tarah D. v. Dcs, T.D. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
  • Tracy D. , Tarah D. v. Dcs, T.D. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
    Sec., ¶ 18 (App. 2010) (juvenile court reversibly erred in commencing termination hearing without mother’s counsel present); Christy A. v. Ariz. Dep’t of Econ.
  • Neal I. v. Dcs, A.I. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
  • Neal I. v. Dcs, A.I. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
    Sec., ¶ 10 (App. 2010) (citation omitted).
  • Yvonne W. v. Dcs, L.H. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
  • Yvonne W. v. Dcs, L.H. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
  • Elbert H. v. Dcs, B.H. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
  • Elbert H. v. Dcs, B.H. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
    “The juvenile court is in the best position to make discretionary findings such as what constitutes good cause for failure to appear.” ¶ 12 (App. 2010).
  • In Re Mh2018-006681 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
  • In Re Mh2018-006681 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
    Sec., ¶¶ 14-16 (App. 2010))).
  • Philip W. v. Dcs, J.M. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
  • Philip W. v. Dcs, J.M. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
    ().“The juvenile court is in the best position to make discretionary findings such as what constitutes good cause for failure to appear.” ¶ 12 (App. 2010).
  • Melissa T. v. Dcs, P.T. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
  • Melissa T. v. Dcs, P.T. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
    Sec., ¶¶ 11-13 (App. 2010) (concluding a parent’s “excuse that she was required to arrange her own transportation is insufficient to establish good cause for failure to appear”).
  • Lewis Y. v. Cassidy G., A.G. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
  • Lewis Y. v. Cassidy G., A.G. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
    ¶ 12 (App. 2010); Yavapai Cty.
  • Brenda D. v. Dep't of Child Safety 410 P.3d 419 Ariz. 2018
  • Brenda D. v. Dep't of Child Safety 410 P.3d 419 Ariz. 2018
    Sec., ¶ 12 (App. 2010) (concluding that the juvenile court did not err in determining that a parent lacked “good cause for her failure to appear on time” because “[w]hile it might be said that arriving late is better than not arriving at all, we cannot see how arriving late can constitute good cause for a failure to ti
  • Edward S. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
  • Edward S. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
    Sec., -82, ¶ 9 (App. 2010).
  • Ashley W. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
  • Ashley W. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
  • David S. v. Dcs, K.S. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
  • David S. v. Dcs, K.S. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
    Sec., ¶ 12 (App. 2010); see also Brenda D., 761 Ariz. Adv.
  • Nicole M. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
  • Nicole M. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
    Sec., ¶ 12 (App. 2010) (“The juvenile court is in the best position to make discretionary findings such as what constitutes good cause for failure to appear.”) (citation omitted).
  • Brenda D. v. Department of Child Safety 393 P.3d 930 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
  • Brenda D. v. Department of Child Safety 393 P.3d 930 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
    See Manuel M., 218 Ariz. at 214, ¶ 31 , (disagreeing with Christy A., 217 Ariz. at 306, ¶ 24 , ); but cf. Bob H., 226 Ariz. at 283, ¶ 17
  • Bryan B. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
  • Bryan B. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
    Sec., ¶¶ 11-13 (App. 2010).
  • Marwa M. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
  • Marwa M. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
  • Marianne N. v. Department of Child Safety 381 P.3d 264 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
  • Marianne N. v. Department of Child Safety 381 P.3d 264 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
    Sec., -82, ¶¶ 8-9, 11-13 (App. 2010) (affirming both findings of lack of good cause where father reported he was misinformed regarding the time of the hearing and had just finished driving 1100 miles, and where mother argued she had to arrange her own transportation and was only thirty minutes late); Adrian E., 215 Ariz
  • Ashlee C. v. Dcs, A.T. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
  • Ashlee C. v. Dcs, A.T. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
    Sec., -82, ¶¶ 8-9, 11-13 (App. 2010) (affirming both findings of lack of good cause where father reported he was misinformed regarding the time of the hearing and had just finished driving 1100 miles, and where mother argued she had to arrange her own transportation and was only thirty minutes late); Adrian E., 215 Ariz
  • Shiloh Z. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
  • Shiloh Z. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
    Sec., -82, ¶¶ 8-9, 11-13 (App. 2010) (affirming both findings of lack of good cause where father reported he was misinformed regarding the time of the hearing and had just finished driving 1100 miles, and where mother argued she had to arrange her own transportation and was only thirty minutes late); Adrian E., 215 Ariz
  • Tanya N. v. Dcs, M.N. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
  • Tanya N. v. Dcs, M.N. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
    Sec., –82, ¶ 9, –35 (App. 2010) (holding that parent’s knowledge of the date and time through a mailed Form III is sufficient notice).
  • Catherine B. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
  • Catherine B. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
  • Brian H. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
  • Brian H. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
    Sec., ¶¶ 12– 13, (affirming a juvenile court’s finding that no good cause existed when a parent arrived late to a hearing and contended she was late because she had to arrange her own transportation).
  • Arlene L. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
  • Arlene L. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
  • Angelette J. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015