Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite Christina G. v. Arizona Department of Economic Security, 256 P.3d 628.

255 citing documents.

Levi R. v. Dcs, E.R. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
Brittany M. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
Brittany M. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
Sec., ¶ 15 (App. 2011); Maricopa Cnty.
Samantha D. v. Dcs, M.D. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
Samantha D. v. Dcs, M.D. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
Sec., ¶ 14 n.6 (App. 2011) (recognizing the failure to develop an argument on appeal usually results in abandonment and waiver of the issue).
Kristian v. v. Dcs, A.V. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
Kristian v. v. Dcs, A.V. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
Sec., ¶ 14 n.6 (App. 2011) (recognizing the failure to develop an argument on appeal usually results in abandonment and waiver of the issue).
Toren C., Fawn W. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
Toren C., Fawn W. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
Sec., ¶ 15 (App. 2011); see also Mary Lou C., 207 Ariz. at 50 ¶ 17 (stating that if the juvenile court does not expressly make a necessary finding, this court may examine the record to determine whether the facts support the implicit finding).
Kansas H., Daniel Z. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
Kansas H., Daniel Z. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
Sec., ¶ 14 n.6 (App. 2011) (recognizing the failure to develop an argument on appeal usually results in abandonment and waiver of the issue).
Byron H. v. Dcs, A.H. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
Byron H. v. Dcs, A.H. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
Fiona T. v. Dcs, S.K. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
Marianna R. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
Fiona T. v. Dcs, S.K. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
Sec., ¶ 14 n.6 (App. 2011) (recognizing the failure to develop an argument on appeal usually results in abandonment and waiver of the issue).
Marianna R. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
Sec., ¶ 14 n.6 (App. 2011) (recognizing the failure to develop an argument on appeal usually results in abandonment and waiver of the issue).
Naomi G. v. Dcs, A.L. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
Stacy R. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
Naomi G. v. Dcs, A.L. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
Sec., ¶ 14 n.6 (App. 2011) (recognizing the failure to develop an argument on appeal usually results in abandonment and waiver of the issue).
Stacy R. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
Sec., ¶ 14 n.6 (App. 2011) (recognizing the failure to develop an argument on appeal usually results in abandonment and waiver of the issue).
Jasmaine H. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
Melaney L. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
Jasmaine H. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
Melaney L. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
Paul B. v. Dcs, D.D. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
Paul B. v. Dcs, D.D. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
Sec., ¶¶ 14–15 (App. 2011) (citation 4 PAUL B. v. DCS, D.D.
Abelina L. v. Dcs, R.M. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
Abelina L. v. Dcs, R.M. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
Sec., ¶ 14 n.6 (App. 2011) (recognizing the failure to develop an argument on appeal usually results in abandonment and waiver of the issue).
Sarah D. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
Sarah D. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
Sec., ¶ 14 (App. 2011) (internal quotation marks and citation omitted).
Frank E. v. Dcs, C.E. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
Frank E. v. Dcs, C.E. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
Branden M. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
Branden M. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
Graciela E. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
Graciela E. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
Sec., ¶¶ 14–15 (App. 2011) (stating that the Department is not required “to provide every conceivable service or to ensure that a parent participates in each service it offers” and that it is “not required to provide services that are futile”).
Ericka H., Terrance D. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
Ericka H., Terrance D. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
Sec., n.6 (App. 2011) (finding waiver where appellant “made a general argument in her opening brief” but failed to develop it).
Enrique N. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
Enrique N. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
Sec., ¶ 14 n.6 (App. 2011) (recognizing that the failure to develop an argument on appeal usually results in abandonment and waiver of the issue).
Paradise L. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
Paradise L. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
Fuess v. Fuess Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
Fuess v. Fuess Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
Sec., ¶ 13 (App. 2011) (noting that the superior court is in “the best position to weigh the evidence, observe the parties, judge the credibility of witnesses”).
Brandi C., Jesse G. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
Brandi C., Jesse G. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
¶ 13 (App. 2011); ¶ 18 (App. 2009).
Michelle D. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
Michelle D. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
¶ 14, n.6 (App. 2011) (failure to develop argument usually results in abandonment and waiver of issue).
Charles v. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020