Cited by
Opinions in Arizona that cite Christina G. v. Arizona Department of Economic Security, 256 P.3d 628.
- Tiffany M. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
- Hallie D. v. Dcs, J.D. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
-
Hallie D. v. Dcs, J.D.
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
Sec., -38, ¶ 26, -35 (App. 2011) (citation omitted).
- Robinson v. Hutchins Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
- Robinson v. Hutchins Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
- Stacey M. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
- Stacey M. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
- Lohengrin M. v. Dcs, J.M. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
- Lohengrin M. v. Dcs, J.M. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
- Trevor H., Jamie W. v. Dcs, L.H. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
-
Trevor H., Jamie W. v. Dcs, L.H.
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
Sec., -38, ¶ 26, - 35 (App. 2011) (citation omitted).
- Melissa W. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
-
Melissa W. v. Dcs
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
Sec., ¶ 13 (App. 2011) (“The juvenile court is in the best position to weigh the evidence, observe the parties, judge the credibility of witnesses, and make appropriate findings.”) (citing Jesus M. v. Ariz. Dep’t of Econ.
- Shella H. v. Department of Child Safety 366 P.3d 106 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
-
Shella H. v. Department of Child Safety
366 P.3d 106
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
Sec., ¶ 13 (App. 2011) (“The juvenile court is in the best position to weigh the evidence, observe the parties, judge the credibility of witnesses, and make appropriate findings.”) (citing Jesus M. v. Ariz. Dep’t of Econ.
- Lynandra W. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
- Derek M. v. Dcs, M.M., D.M. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
- Derek M. v. Dcs, M.M., D.M. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
-
Lynandra W. v. Dcs
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
Sec., ¶ 13 (App. 2011) (“The juvenile court is in the best position to weigh the evidence, observe the parties, judge the credibility of witnesses, and make appropriate findings.”) (citing Jesus M. v. Ariz. Dep’t of Econ.
- Tamarra P. v. Dcs, M.B. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
-
Tamarra P. v. Dcs, M.B.
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
Sec., ¶ 27 (App. 2011); Linda V. v. Ariz. Dep’t of Econ.
- Jurgen M., Ashley C. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
- Jurgen M., Ashley C. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
- Karli B. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
-
Karli B. v. Dcs
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
Sec., ¶ 15 (App. 2011) (internal punctuation omitted).
- Mary B., Christopher W. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
-
Mary B., Christopher W. v. Dcs
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
Sec., ¶ 27 (App. 2011); Linda V. v. Ariz. Dep’t of Econ.
- Rhett U v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
- Rhett U v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
- Ashlyn H. v. Dcs, A.O. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
-
Ashlyn H. v. Dcs, A.O.
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
Sec., n.8, ¶ 15, n.8 (App. 2011) (indicating a parent may waive argument that DCS failed to provide adequate services when the parent does not request additional services or otherwise object to the manner court-ordered services are provided).
- Veronica M. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
-
Veronica M. v. Dcs
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
Sec., -35, ¶¶ 12-15, -32 (App. 2011).
- Joscilin S. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
- Joscilin S. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
- Jane B. v. Dcs, J.R. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
- Jane B. v. Dcs, J.R. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
- Erin R. v. Dcs, M.R. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
-
Erin R. v. Dcs, M.R.
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
Sec., -35, ¶¶ 12-15, -32 (App. 2011).
- Candra H. v. Dcs, C.H. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
- Candra H. v. Dcs, C.H. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
- Tiffany F. v. Dcs, G.F. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
- Tiffany F. v. Dcs, G.F. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
- Shawna S. v. Dcs, R.G. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
-
Shawna S. v. Dcs, R.G.
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
n.8, ¶ 15, n.8 (App. 2011).
- Jacqueline C. v. Ades Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
-
Jacqueline C. v. Ades
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
Sec., -35, ¶ 14, -32 (App. 2011).
- Kimberly P. v. Ades, T.P. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
- Kimberly P. v. Ades, T.P. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
- Desirae M. v. Ades, L.M. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014