Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite Mario G. v. Arizona Department of Economic Security, 257 P.3d 1162.

96 citing documents.

Mayra T. v. Dcs, C.L. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
Mayra T. v. Dcs, C.L. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
§ 8-533(B); –85, ¶ 11 (App. 2011).2 ¶7 We view the evidence in the light most favorable to sustaining the superior court’s findings.
Kandyse A. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
Kandyse A. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
Crystal E. v. Department of Child Safety 390 P.3d 1222 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
Crystal E. v. Department of Child Safety 390 P.3d 1222 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
Jeremy M. v. Dcs, J.J. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
Jeremy M. v. Dcs, J.J. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
Guthrie S. v. Dcs, A.S. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
Guthrie S. v. Dcs, A.S. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
Sec., ¶ 11 (App. 2011); Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 8-533(B).
Kristi S. v. Dcs, A.T. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
Kristi S. v. Dcs, A.T. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
§ 8–533(B); ¶ 11 (App. 2011).
Franswa C. v. Dcs, J.C. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
Franswa C. v. Dcs, J.C. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
Sec., ¶ 11 (App. 2011); A.R.S.
Mandy P. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
Mandy P. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
Sec., ¶ 11 (App. 2011); A.R.S.
Jean K. v. Jeremy M., J.K. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
Jean K. v. Jeremy M., J.K. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
Ryan W. v. Dcs, J.W. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
Ryan W. v. Dcs, J.W. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
Sec., ¶ 11 (App. 2011); A.R.S.
Cynthia G. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
Cynthia G. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
Sec., ¶ 15 (App. 2011).2 II.
Joseph W. v. Dcs, C.W. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
Joseph W. v. Dcs, C.W. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
Jerry J. v. Dcs, E.B. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
Jerry J. v. Dcs, E.B. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
Michelle H. v. Dcs, J.S. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
Chantelle L. v. Dcs, C.W. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
Michelle H. v. Dcs, J.S. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
Sec., ¶ 11 (App. 2011); A.R.S.
Chantelle L. v. Dcs, C.W. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
Sec., ¶ 11 (App. 2011); A.R.S.
Jose N. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
Jose N. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
Sec., ¶ 15, (emphasis added) (citing Linda V. v. Ariz. Dep’t of Econ.
Jared M., Amber M. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
Jared M., Amber M. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
Sec., –87 ¶¶ 19–20, –67 (App. 2011) (finding sufficient constitutional nexus to terminate father’s rights to child born nine months after termination of his rights to other child where circumstances of prior abuse persisted).
Samantha M., Nykkolas S. v. Dcs, K.S. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
Samantha M., Nykkolas S. v. Dcs, K.S. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
Rosabelle P., Artem D. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
Rosabelle P., Artem D. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
Sec., ¶¶ 15-16, this court held a juvenile court may terminate parental rights to a child who has not been abused when DCS proves a sufficient nexus between the past child abuse and the potential for future abuse.
Chereka v. Gadissa Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
Chereka v. Gadissa Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
Manuel M. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
Manuel M. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
Sec., –86, ¶ 16, –66 (App. 2011).
Tina T. v. Department of Child Safety 339 P.3d 1040 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
Tina T. v. Department of Child Safety 339 P.3d 1040 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
Department of Child Safety v. Beene 332 P.3d 47 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
Department of Child Safety v. Beene 332 P.3d 47 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014

Explore

Outcomes

Cited by