Cited by

58 citing documents.

S.S., S.S. v. Stephanie H. 388 P.3d 569 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
S.S., S.S. v. Stephanie H. 388 P.3d 569 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
Sec., ¶ 26 (App. 2011) ("[T]he necessary ICWA 'active efforts' finding must .
Gila River Indian Community v. Department of Child Safety 363 P.3d 148 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
Gila River Indian Community v. Department of Child Safety 363 P.3d 148 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
Sec., ¶¶ 17–18 (App. 2011) (choosing to analyze 4 GILA RIVER, DESTINY O. v. DCS, et al. Opinion of the Court standard of proof for “active efforts” under ICWA, notwithstanding appellant’s failure to raise issue in juvenile court); Cit
Manuel W. v. Dcs, M.W. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
Manuel W. v. Dcs, M.W. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
Sec., -23, ¶¶ 29, 35 (App. 2011) (finding DCS made “active efforts” to prevent break up of family where caseworker advised non-resident father of his need to attend counseling and encouraged him to call if he had difficulty making the arrangements); Mary Ellen C., 193 Ariz. at 192-93, ¶¶ 37-42 (reversing severance where
Charlotte G. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
Charlotte G. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
Sec., ¶ 34, (stating “neither ICWA nor Arizona law mandates that ADES provide every imaginable service or program designed to prevent the breakup of the Indian family before the court may find that ‘active efforts’ took place”).