Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite Angel B. v. Vanessa J., 316 P.3d 1257.

37 citing documents.

McAfee v. Strothers Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2026
Lincoln v. McDaniel Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2026
Lincoln v. McDaniel Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2026
¶ 11 (App. 2014) (“Once a court with original jurisdiction issues an initial child custody order, the UCCJEA gives that court exclusive, continuing jurisdiction over all future custody determinations.”).
Phillip G. v. Hon korbin-steiner/dcs 542 P.3d 664 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
Phillip G. v. Hon korbin-steiner/dcs 542 P.3d 664 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
The UCCJEA is “designed to prevent competing and conflicting custody orders by courts in different jurisdictions” that could result in “unilateral removals of children from or to various jurisdictions.” ¶ 8 (App. 2014).
In Re the Marriage of Morris & Mandel 529 P.3d 94 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2023
In Re the Marriage of Morris & Mandel 529 P.3d 94 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2023
Antonetti v. Hon. Westerhausen Klinger 523 P.3d 969 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
Antonetti v. Hon. Westerhausen Klinger 523 P.3d 969 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
¶14 “[T]o prevent competing and conflicting custody orders by courts in different jurisdictions[,]” the UCCJEA vests “exclusive, continuing jurisdiction with the state that issues the initial child custody determination, subject to statutory exceptions.” ¶ 8 (App. 2014); see also A.R.S.
Tracy D. , Tarah D. v. Dcs, T.D. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
Tracy D. , Tarah D. v. Dcs, T.D. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
§§ 25-1002(4)(A), 25-1031(A)(1); ¶ 14 (App. 2014).
Allegra G. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
Allegra G. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
¶ 6 (App. 2014) (subject matter jurisdiction); ¶ 9 (App. 2018) (personal jurisdiction).
Ericka H., Terrance D. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
Ericka H., Terrance D. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
Troy W. v. Dcs, T.W. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
Troy W. v. Dcs, T.W. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
DISCUSSION A. Subject Matter Jurisdiction ¶8 Jurisdiction over child custody matters is governed by the Uniform Child Custody Jurisdiction and Enforcement Act (“UCCJEA”), which has been “adopted in all 50 states and the District of Columbia.” ¶ 7 (App. 2014).
Jennifer G. v. Michael C., A.C. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
Jennifer G. v. Michael C., A.C. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
Danko v. Danko Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
Danko v. Danko Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
§ 25-1063 ("A court of this state shall afford full faith and credit to an order that is issued by another state, that is consistent with [the UCCJEA]."); ("[T]he UCCJEA provides that the issuance of a child custody order by a court with jurisdiction is binding on other states.").
Aaron B. v. Ashley H. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
Aaron B. v. Ashley H. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
Monique B./donald B. v. Hon duncan/dcs 429 P.3d 1165 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
Monique B./donald B. v. Hon duncan/dcs 429 P.3d 1165 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
Key purposes of the UCCJEA include ‘to create consistency in interstate child custody jurisdiction and enforcement proceedings.’” -72 ¶ 7 (App. 2014) (citations omitted); see also A.R.S.
Anthony v. Anthony Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
Anthony v. Anthony Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
§ 25-1031(A)(1); ¶ 9 (App. 2014) (finding that generally the court in the child’s home state is the court that has original jurisdiction over child custody (citation omitted)).
Jesse B. v. Dcs, C.B. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
Jesse B. v. Dcs, C.B. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
Frank R. v. Mother Goose Adoptions 367 P.3d 88 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2016
Frank R. v. Mother Goose Adoptions 367 P.3d 88 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2016
In addition, “[t]his court has an independent obligation to evaluate subject matter jurisdiction.”
Joslin G. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
Joslin G. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
¶ 6, Ariz. Dep’t of Econ.
Michelle M. v. Loren C., R.H. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
Michelle M. v. Loren C., R.H. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
Decision of the Court ¶6 Nevertheless, P.3d 1257 (App. 2014), which we published while Father’s petition was under advisement and discuss in detail below.
Jason B. v. Dcs, S.B. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
Jason B. v. Dcs, S.B. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014

Explore

Outcomes

Cited by