Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite Shawanee S. v. Arizona Department of Economic Security, 319 P.3d 236.

316 citing documents.

James W. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
James W. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
Sec., –77, ¶ 9, –39 (App. 2014).
Megan M., Dustin J. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
Cindy L., David L. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
Megan M., Dustin J. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
Sec., - 77, ¶ 9, -39 (App. 2014).
Cindy L., David L. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
Sec., ¶¶ 17-18, (noting that parent waived right to challenge the Department’s reasonable efforts to provide family reunification services when the parent failed to raise the argument at the review hearings or at the termination hearing).
Rustica D. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
Rustica D. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
Shawna S. v. Dcs, R.G. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
Shawna S. v. Dcs, R.G. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
Sec., ¶ 11, (holding that a parent waived a claim that DCS failed to provide appropriate unification services by failing to object in the juvenile court); Kimu P. v. Ariz. Dep't of Econ.
Lisa H. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
Lisa H. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
parent.” ¶ 12, (internal quotations and citation omitted).
Raegina M. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
Raegina M. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
Sec., -79, ¶¶ 16- 18, -41 (2014) (holding that by failing to bring alleged lack of reunification services to the juvenile court’s attention, parent is precluded from pursuing that issue for the first time on appeal).
Kimberly P. v. Ades, T.P. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
Kimberly P. v. Ades, T.P. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014