DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite Shawanee S. v. Arizona Department of Economic Security, 319 P.3d 236.

321 citing documents.

  • Jessica H. v. Dcs, X.H. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
    Sec., -79, ¶ 16 (App. 2014) (noting that parents must “voice their concerns about services” in a “timely manner” and failing to do so precludes arguing on appeal that services were inadequate).4 ¶11 Mother next argues the juvenile court erred in finding clear and convincing evidence supported the statutory gr
  • Jerry P. v. Dcs, A.P. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
  • Jerry P. v. Dcs, A.P. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
  • Kelly B. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
  • Kelly B. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
    Sec., -77, ¶ 9, -39 (App. 2014).
  • James W. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
  • James W. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
    Sec., –77, ¶ 9, –39 (App. 2014).
  • Megan M., Dustin J. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
  • Cindy L., David L. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
  • Megan M., Dustin J. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
    Sec., - 77, ¶ 9, -39 (App. 2014).
  • Cindy L., David L. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
    Sec., ¶¶ 17-18, (noting that parent waived right to challenge the Department’s reasonable efforts to provide family reunification services when the parent failed to raise the argument at the review hearings or at the termination hearing).
  • Rustica D. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
  • Rustica D. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
  • Shawna S. v. Dcs, R.G. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
  • Shawna S. v. Dcs, R.G. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
    Sec., ¶ 11, (holding that a parent waived a claim that DCS failed to provide appropriate unification services by failing to object in the juvenile court); Kimu P. v. Ariz. Dep't of Econ.
  • Lisa H. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
  • Lisa H. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
    parent.” ¶ 12, (internal quotations and citation omitted).
  • Raegina M. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
  • Raegina M. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
    Sec., -79, ¶¶ 16- 18, -41 (2014) (holding that by failing to bring alleged lack of reunification services to the juvenile court’s attention, parent is precluded from pursuing that issue for the first time on appeal).
  • Kimberly P. v. Ades, T.P. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
  • Kimberly P. v. Ades, T.P. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014