Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite Tina T. v. Department of Child Safety, 339 P.3d 1040.

37 citing documents.

In Re Term of Parental Rights as to E.M. and D.M. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2026
See Tina T. v. Dep’t of Child Safety, ¶ 14 (App. 2014); see also Ariz. R.P.
In Re Term of Parental Rights as to T.A. and J.A. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2025
In Re Term of Parental Rights as to T.A. and J.A. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2025
Ct. 353(e)(3); see also Tina T. v. Dep’t of Child Safety, ¶ 14 (App. 2014), abrogated on other grounds by Sandra R. v. Dep’t of Child Safety
In Re Term of Parental Rights as to L.Z. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
In Re Term of Parental Rights as to L.Z. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
Ct. 353(e)(3); ¶ 16 (App. 2014) (stating that we review whether "the juvenile court record includes evidence that, if believed, would establish the statutory grounds for termination of Mother's parental rights")
Adam C., Kalynn R. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
Adam C., Kalynn R. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
Ct. 66(D)(1)(b) (June 30, 2022); Tina T. v. Dep’t of Child Safety, ¶ 16 (App. 2014), abrogated on other grounds by Sandra R. v. Dep’t of Child Safety
Jimmy N., Vashti H. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
Jimmy N., Vashti H. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
Ct. 66(D)(1); ¶ 16 (App. 2014)
Sandra R./sergio C. v. dcs/m.R./f.M./j.M. Ariz. 2020
Sandra R./sergio C. v. dcs/m.R./f.M./j.M. Ariz. 2020
See Tina T. v. Dep’t of Child Safety, –300 ¶ 18 (App. 2014) (finding sufficient constitutional nexus between mother’s willful abuse of her two children and risk of abuse to a child born after previous severance); Mario G. v. Ariz. Dep’t of Econ.
Sandra R,, Sergio C. v. Dcs 436 P.3d 503 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
Sandra R,, Sergio C. v. Dcs 436 P.3d 503 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
king termination of rights to show, at the statutory-grounds stage, “a constitutional nexus between the 9 SANDRA R., SERGIO C. v. DCS, et al. Opinion of the Court prior abuse and the risk of future abuse to the child at issue.” ¶ 11 (App. 2018) ( ¶ 17 (App. 2014)); Mario G., 227 Ariz. at 285, ¶ 16.
Seth M. v. Arienne M. 426 P.3d 1224 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
Seth M. v. Arienne M. 426 P.3d 1224 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
¶11 We have previously required an additional showing when “the grounds for termination of a parent’s rights to one child are based on abuse of another child.” Tina T. v. Dep’t of Child Safety, ¶ 17 (App. 2014).
Tabitha S. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
Tabitha S. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
¶ 17 (App. 2014) (quoting Linda V. v. Ariz. Dep't of Econ.
Gabrielle F. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
Gabrielle F. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
Tina T. v. Dep’t of Child Safety, ¶ 17 (App. 2014).
Peter G. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
Peter G. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
6 PETER G. v. DCS, et al. Decision of the Court 295, 298-99, ¶ 15, -44 (App. 2014)).
Marianne N. v. Department of Child Safety 381 P.3d 264 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
Marianne N. v. Department of Child Safety 381 P.3d 264 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
See Tina T. v. Dep’t of Child Safety, ¶ 16 (App. 2014) (noting the Arizona Rules of Procedure for the Juvenile Court protect a parent from losing parental rights solely upon the basis that she does not contest the allegations of the petition) (citing In re Brittany Ann H., 607 N.W.2d 607, 619, ¶ 52 (Wis.
Joseph W. v. Dcs, C.W. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
Joseph W. v. Dcs, C.W. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
See Tina T. v. Dep’t of Child Safety, ¶ 19, Mario G. v. Ariz. Dep’t of Econ.
Jerry J. v. Dcs, E.B. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
Timothy W. v. Department of Child Safety 377 P.3d 1026 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
Jerry J. v. Dcs, E.B. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
See Tina T. v. Dep’t of Child Safety, ¶ 19, Mario G. v. Ariz. Dep’t of Econ.
Timothy W. v. Department of Child Safety 377 P.3d 1026 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
In reviewing the procedural requirements for accepting “a no contest plea in a termination proceeding, we turn for guidance to the analogous context of guilty or no contest pleas made by criminal defendants.” Tina T. v. Dep’t of Child Safety, -99, ¶ 15 (App. 2014).
Harley D. v. Amanda C., L.C. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
Harley D. v. Amanda C., L.C. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
Ct. Rule 66(D)(1); Tina T. v. Dep’t of Child Safety, B.H., - 99, ¶¶ 15-16 (App. 2014).
Ronda J. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
Ronda J. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
Grounds for Termination ¶14 When a severance order is based on abuse of another child, “DCS must show a constitutional nexus between the prior abuse and the risk of future abuse to the child at issue.” ¶ 17 (App. 2014).
Jared M., Amber M. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
Jared M., Amber M. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
Tina T. v. Dep’t of Child Safety, ¶ 17
Samantha M., Nykkolas S. v. Dcs, K.S. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
Samantha M., Nykkolas S. v. Dcs, K.S. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
See Tina T. v. Dep’t of Child Safety, ¶ 19, Mario G. v. Ariz. Dep’t of Econ.