Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite In Re the Appeal in Maricopa County Juvenile Action No. JS-8287, 828 P.2d 1245.

28 citing documents.

Kurwin M. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
Kurwin M. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
Action No. JS-8287, (holding that the record supported the court's active efforts finding because "rehabilitative programs repeatedly were offered .
Amanda G. v. Dcs, A.O. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
Amanda G. v. Dcs, A.O. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
Action No. JS-8287, (“[T]he juvenile court will be deemed to have made every finding necessary to support the judgement.”).
Gila River Indian Community v. Department of Child Safety 363 P.3d 148 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
Gila River Indian Community v. Department of Child Safety 363 P.3d 148 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
Action No. JS-8287, (consulting Guidelines in deciding whether good cause existed to deny petition to transfer custody matter to tribal court).
Gavino C. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
Gavino C. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
Action No. JS-8287, (citations omitted).
Navajo Nation v. Arizona Department of Economic Security 284 P.3d 29 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2012
Navajo Nation v. Arizona Department of Economic Security 284 P.3d 29 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2012
Action No. JS-8287, , (considering bond with foster parents a relevant factor to finding good cause in denying a transfer of jurisdiction under ICWA).
Yvonne L. v. Arizona Department of Economic Security 258 P.3d 233 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2011
Yvonne L. v. Arizona Department of Economic Security 258 P.3d 233 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2011
An early Arizona case falls into this category, but we are not bound by a statement in Maricopa *421 County Juvenile Action No. JS-8287, , that "active efforts" have to be proven beyond a reasonable doubt.
Arizona Department of Economic Security v. Matthew L. 225 P.3d 604 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2010
Arizona Department of Economic Security v. Matthew L. 225 P.3d 604 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2010
Action No. JS-8287, , (citations omitted).
Valerie M. v. Arizona Department of Economic Security 195 P.3d 192 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2008
Valerie M. v. Arizona Department of Economic Security 195 P.3d 192 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2008
Action No. JS-8287, , (stating that § 1912(f) imposes requirements “in addition to meeting the Arizona requirement that parental rights may only be terminated for a number of stated reasons”).
Bobby G. v. Ades & Allison G. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2008
Bobby G. v. Ades & Allison G. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2008
Action No. JS-8287, quoting In re Pima County Sev.
Steven H. v. Arizona Department of Economic Security 190 P.3d 180 Ariz. 2008
Steven H. v. Arizona Department of Economic Security 190 P.3d 180 Ariz. 2008
Arizona Department of Economic Security v. Bernini 48 P.3d 512 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2002
Arizona Department of Economic Security v. Bernini 48 P.3d 512 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2002
In re Maricopa County Juvenile Action No. JS-8287
State Ex Rel. Romley v. Superior Court 7 P.3d 970 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2000
State Ex Rel. Romley v. Superior Court 7 P.3d 970 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2000
See, e.g., Matter of Maricopa County Juvenile Action No. JS-8287, , (affirming the trial *167 court’s decision to terminate biological mother’s parental rights based upon the standard of proof of beyond a reasonable doubt).
Michael J., Jr. v. Michael J., Sr. 7 P.3d 960 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2000
Michael J., Jr. v. Michael J., Sr. 7 P.3d 960 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2000
Rachelle S. v. Arizona Department of Economic Security 958 P.2d 459 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1998
Rachelle S. v. Arizona Department of Economic Security 958 P.2d 459 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1998
See Maricopa County Juvenile Action No. JS-8287, 111 , 1252 (App.1991); Maricopa County Juvenile Action No. A-25525, , 532 n. 4, , 232 n. 4 (App.1983); Pima County Juvenile Action No. S-903, , cert.