Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite In re the Appeal in Maricopa County Juvenile Action No. JS-8441, 857 P.2d 1317.

42 citing documents.

In Re Term of Parental Rights as to L.C. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2024
In Re Term of Parental Rights as to L.C. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2024
Action No. JS-8441, (“The benefit of severance to the child is that which the legislature intended: freedom to be adopted into a stable and nurturing home.”).
In Re Term of Parental Rights as to E.W. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2024
In Re Term of Parental Rights as to E.W. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2024
Action No. JS-8441, (“The benefit of severance to the 6 IN RE TERM OF PARENTAL RIGHTS AS TO E.W.
Rick R. v. Dcs, H.R. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
Rick R. v. Dcs, H.R. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
Quinton v. v. Dcs, A.V. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
Quinton v. v. Dcs, A.V. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
Action No. JS-8441, (holding that a parent who participated in some services but maintained instability in his residence and employment substantially neglected to remedy the circumstances causing the child to be in an out-of-home placement), ¶ 41 (200
Larrissa P. v. Dcs, J.H. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
Larrissa P. v. Dcs, J.H. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
Maurice N. v. Dcs, M.N. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
Maurice N. v. Dcs, M.N. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
Action No. JS-8441, abrogated on other grounds by Kent K., 210 Ariz. at 282, ¶ 12, 110 P.3d at 1016.
Jeremy M. v. Dcs, J.J. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
Jeremy M. v. Dcs, J.J. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
¶11 Father takes issue with the juvenile court’s reliance on Maricopa County Juvenile Action No. JS-8441, ( ¶ 12 (2005)), for the court’s conclusion that Father’s inconsistent participation in services for a special needs child can constitute the circumstances causing the out-of-home placement.
Jason B. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
Jason B. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
Thomas M. v. Dcs, E.M. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
Thomas M. v. Dcs, E.M. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
Darren G. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
Darren G. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
Juvenile Action No. JS-8441I, abrogated on other grounds by Kent K., 210 Ariz. at 282, 288, ¶¶ 12, 41.
Jesse O., Daniel W. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
Jesse O., Daniel W. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
Tiana S. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
Tiana S. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
Action No. JS-8441, (citation omitted), abrogated on other grounds by Kent K., P.3d 1013.
Catherine B. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
Catherine B. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
Action No. JS-8441, abrogated on other grounds by Kent K., 210 Ariz. at 282, 288, ¶¶ 12, 41, 110 P.3d at 1016, 1022.
Xavier R. and Athena R. v. Ades and Joseph R. 280 P.3d 640 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2012
Xavier R. and Athena R. v. Ades and Joseph R. 280 P.3d 640 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2012
Action No. JS-8441, (appellate court does not reweigh evidence), abrogated on other grounds by Kent K., ¶¶ 12, 22 8 110 P.3d at 1016, 1018.
Jordan C. v. Arizona Department of Economic Security 219 P.3d 296 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2009
Jordan C. , Jesse C., Kailynn C., Michele C. v. Ades Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2009
Jordan C. , Jesse C., Kailynn C., Michele C. v. Ades Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2009
Action No. JS-8441, ¶¶ 8-22, -18 (2005).
Jordan C. v. Arizona Department of Economic Security 219 P.3d 296 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2009
Action No. JS-844I, , ¶¶ 8-22 , -18 (2005).
Marina P. v. Arizona Department of Economic Security 152 P.3d 1209 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2007
Marina P. v. Arizona Department of Economic Security 152 P.3d 1209 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2007
Action No. JS-8441, , abrogated on other grounds by Kent K., 210 Ariz. at 282-84 , 110 P.3d at 1016-18 .
Kent K. v. Bobby M. 110 P.3d 1013 Ariz. 2005
Kent K. v. Bobby M. 110 P.3d 1013 Ariz. 2005
See, e.g., Maricopa County Juvenile Action No. JS-9104, (“The severing court must find by clear and convincing evidence both the statutory elements plus the 7 best interests of the child.”); Maricopa County Juvenile Action No. JS-8441, (“A termination order must be supported by clear and convincing evidence establishing a statutory ground and the best interest of the child.”).
Arizona Department of Economic Security v. Oscar O. 100 P.3d 943 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2004
Arizona Department of Economic Security v. Oscar O. 100 P.3d 943 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2004
Sec., P.2d 684 (App. 1998); In re Maricopa County Juvenile Action No. JS-6520, P.2d 4 335 (App. 1988) (best interests of child in potentially foster-adoptive home favored severance so child could be free for adoption); In re Maricopa County Juvenile Action No. JS-8441, (“The benefit of severance to the child is that which the legislature intended: freedom to be adopted into a stable and nurturing home.”); In re Pima County Juvenile Action No. S-2460, (“The immediate availability of an adoptive
Jesus M. v. Arizona Department of Economic Security 53 P.3d 203 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2002
Jesus M. v. Arizona Department of Economic Security 53 P.3d 203 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2002
See In re Pima County Severance Action No. S-1607, , (where certain facts “sharply disputed,” appellate court “deferfs] to the judgment of the trial court which had the opportunity to assess the credibility, attitude and condition of the parties at trial”); In re Maricopa County Juvenile Action No. JS-8441, , (“[T]his court will accept the findings of the juvenile court unless they are clearly erroneous; we will not reweigh the evidence.”); In re Pima County Juvenile Action No. S-139, 27 Ariz.Ap
In re the Appeal in Maricopa County 904 P.2d 1279 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1995
In re the Appeal in Maricopa County 904 P.2d 1279 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1995
E.g., Maricopa County Juvenile Action No. JS-501568, , (citing Pima County Severance Action No. S-1607, , ); Maricopa County Juvenile Action No. JS-8441, , 857 P.2d.