Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite In Re the Appeal in Maricopa County Juvenile Action No. JD-5312, 873 P.2d 710.

94 citing documents.

Susan J. v. Dcs, S.J. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
Susan J. v. Dcs, S.J. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
Action No. JD-5312, (finding DCS is not required to provide parent visitation that could adversely affect the child).
Earl S. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
Earl S. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
See Maricopa County Juvenile Action No. JD-5312, (once a right to visitation is at issue the superior court has broad discretion).
Samantha M. v. Dcs, M.G. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
Samantha M. v. Dcs, M.G. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
Action No. JD-5312, see also Michael M., 202 Ariz. at 201, ¶ 11.
Jeremy v. v. Judith H., K.V. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
Jeremy v. v. Judith H., K.V. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
Melissa W. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
Melissa W. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
Lester L. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
Lester L. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
Action No. JD-5312, ("[v]isitation with the child may be critical to the parent's ability" to show child should be returned to his custody).
Sherri C. v. Dcs, H.C. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
Vanessa T. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
Sherri C. v. Dcs, H.C. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
Vanessa T. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
Action No. JD-5312, –75, –13 (App. 1994)), we have jurisdiction under Arizona Revised Statutes (“A.R.S.”) § 8-235.2 2 Absent material revisions after the relevant date, we cite a statute’s current version.
Rachel H. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
Rachel H. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
Daniel F. v. Dcs, C.F. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
Daniel F. v. Dcs, C.F. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
Alicia H. v. Ades Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
Alicia H. v. Ades Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
section 8-235 and Arizona Rule of the Juvenile Court 103(A), “[a]ny aggrieved party” may “appeal from a final order of the juvenile court[.]” ¶6 Citing Maricopa County Juvenile Action No. JD-5312, ADES suggests that we have jurisdiction here because the juvenile court’s November 25, 2013 minute entry is a final, appealable order.
Mysti B. v. Ades Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
Mysti B. v. Ades Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
In re Javier B. 280 P.3d 644 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2012
In re Javier B. 280 P.3d 644 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2012
Action No. JD-5312, , (an order terminating a parent’s visitation rights is a final order).
Francisco F. v. Arizona Department of Economic Security 266 P.3d 1075 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2011
Francisco F. v. Arizona Department of Economic Security 266 P.3d 1075 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2011
Yvonne L. v. Arizona Department of Economic Security 258 P.3d 233 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2011
Yvonne L. v. Arizona Department of Economic Security 258 P.3d 233 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2011
Lindsey M. v. Rizona Department of Economic Security 127 P.3d 59 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2006
Lindsey M. v. Rizona Department of Economic Security 127 P.3d 59 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2006
been held to be or recognized as final and appealable are “orders declaring children dependent and orders reaffirming findings that children are dependent,” id.; “an order issued pursuant to the juvenile court’s periodic review of a determination of dependency or of a custodial arrangement,” id.; an order terminating a parent’s visitation rights, In re Maricopa County Juvenile Action No. JD-5312, , or substantially limiting those rights, In re Maricopa County Juvenile Action No. JD-500116, -43 ,
Willie G. & Bonnie H. v. Ades, Nycole G. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2005
Willie G. & Bonnie H. v. Ades, Nycole G. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2005
In re Maricopa County Juvenile Action No. JD-5312
Willie G. v. Arizona Department of Economic Security 119 P.3d 1034 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2005
Willie G. v. Arizona Department of Economic Security 119 P.3d 1034 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2005
In re Maricopa County Juvenile Action No. JD-5312
Lashonda M. v. Ades, Elijah M. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2005
Lashonda M. v. Ades, Elijah M. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2005
See In re Maricopa County Juvenile Action No. JD-5312, P.2d 710 (App. 1994).
Lashonda M. v. Arizona Department of Economic Security 107 P.3d 923 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2005
Lashonda M. v. Arizona Department of Economic Security 107 P.3d 923 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2005
See In re Maricopa County Juvenile Action No. JD-5312
Michael M. v. Arizona Department of Economic Security 42 P.3d 1163 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2002
Michael M. v. Arizona Department of Economic Security 42 P.3d 1163 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2002
In re Maricopa County Juvenile Action No. JD-5312
Rita J. v. Arizona Department of Economic Security 1 P.3d 155 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2000
Rita J. v. Arizona Department of Economic Security 1 P.3d 155 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2000
In re Maricopa County Juvenile Action No. JD-5312