Cited by
Opinions in Arizona that cite Michael J., Jr. v. Michael J., Sr., 7 P.3d 960.
- In Re Term of Parental Rights as to J.C. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2025
-
In Re Term of Parental Rights as to J.C.
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2025
¶22 ICWA applies to any “child custody proceeding” involving an “Indian child.” Michael J., Jr. v. Michael J., Sr., ¶ 9 (App. 2000).
- In Re Guardianship of A.K. 557 P.3d 770 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2024
-
In Re Guardianship of A.K.
557 P.3d 770
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2024
“Our role when deciding jurisdictional issues under ICWA is to decide ‘who should make the custody determination concerning the child—not what the outcome of that determination should be.’” Michael J., Jr. v. Michael J., Sr., ¶ 7 (App. 2000) (cleaned up) (quoting Mississippi Band of Choctaw Indians v. Holyfield, 490 U.S. 30, 53 (1989)).
- Aimee H. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
-
Aimee H. v. Dcs
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
Michael J., Jr. v. Michael J., Sr., ¶ 7 (App. 2000).
- Alexandra K. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
-
Alexandra K. v. Dcs
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
Michael J., Jr. v. Michael J., Sr., ¶ 7 (App. 2000).
- Dcs v. Hon. stocking-tate/mark R. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
- Dep't of Child Safety v. Stocking-Tate 446 P.3d 813 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
-
Dcs v. Hon. stocking-tate/mark R.
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
Sec., ¶ 5 (App. 2008); Michael J., Jr. v. Michael J., Sr., ¶ 4 (App. 2000).
-
Dep't of Child Safety v. Stocking-Tate
446 P.3d 813
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
41, ¶ 5, , 513 (App. 2008) ; Michael J., Jr. v. Michael J., Sr. , , 155, ¶ 4, , 961 (App. 2000).
- Navajo Nation v. Dep't of Child Safety 441 P.3d 982 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
-
Navajo Nation v. Dep't of Child Safety
441 P.3d 982
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
Michael J., Jr. v. Michael J., Sr. , , 156 ¶ 7, , 962 (App. 2000).
- S.S., S.S. v. Stephanie H. 388 P.3d 569 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
-
S.S., S.S. v. Stephanie H.
388 P.3d 569
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
Michael J., Jr. v. Michael J., Sr., ¶ 7 (App. 2000).
- Gila River Indian Community v. Department of Child Safety 379 P.3d 1016 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
- Gric v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
-
Gila River Indian Community v. Department of Child Safety
379 P.3d 1016
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
Sec., ¶ 10 , Michael J., Jr. v. Michael J., Sr., ¶ 7
-
Gric v. Dcs
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
Sec., ¶ 10, Michael J., Jr. v. Michael J., Sr., ¶ 7
- Smith v. Frederick Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
-
Followed
Smith v. Frederick
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
¶ 15, (stating we follow the plain meaning of a statute where its language is unambiguous).
- Roberto F. v. Department of Child Safety 332 P.3d 614 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
-
Roberto F. v. Department of Child Safety
332 P.3d 614
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
¶ 10 , (“The [Indian Child Welfare] Act grants tribal courts exclusive jurisdiction over child custody proceedings involving Indian children domiciled on a reservation ...
- Andrew R. v. Arizona Department of Economic Security 224 P.3d 950 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2010
- Jared P. v. Glade T. 209 P.3d 157 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2009
-
Jared P. v. Glade T.
209 P.3d 157
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2009
Ariz. Dep’t of Revenue v. Capitol Castings, Inc., ¶ 9 , ); Michael J., Jr. v. Michael J., Sr., ¶ 7 , (citing Columbia Parear Corp. v. Ariz. Dep’t of Transp., ¶ 11 , ).
- Valerie M. v. Arizona Department of Economic Security 195 P.3d 192 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2008
-
Valerie M. v. Arizona Department of Economic Security
195 P.3d 192
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2008
See Michael /., Jr. v. Michael J., Sr., ¶ 7
- Arizona Department of Economic Security v. Bernini 48 P.3d 512 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2002
-
Arizona Department of Economic Security v. Bernini
48 P.3d 512
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2002
See Michael J., Jr. v. Michael J., Sr., , (appellate court reviews de novo “the interpretation and application of (ICWA]”).
- Arizona Libertarian Party v. Schmeral 28 P.3d 948 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2001
-
Arizona Libertarian Party v. Schmeral
28 P.3d 948
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2001
Michael J., Jr. v. Michael J., Sr., -58 , -64 (App.2000) (court construes statutes to give effect to legislative intent).