Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite In re MH 2006-000749, 152 P.3d 1201.

61 citing documents.

GOVUVEIA v. GRULER Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2026
See In re MH 2006-000749, ¶ 18 (App. 2007) (the beneficiary of a statute may waive its protections).
In Re Pinal County Mental Health Case Mh202400075 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2024
In Re Pinal County Mental Health Case Mh202400075 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2024
MENTAL HEALTH CASE NO. MH202400075 Opinion of the Court (we review issues of statutory interpretation de novo).
In Re Daniel G. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
In Re Daniel G. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
In Re Pima County Mental Health Case No. Mh20200860 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2022
In Re Pima County Mental Health Case No. Mh20200860 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2022
Mental Health No. MH 2006-000749
In Re Mh2018-00006 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
In Re Mh2018-00006 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
Action No. MH-1140-6-93, (explaining we will affirm on substantial evidence); In re MH 2006-000749, ¶ 13 (App. 2007) (explaining we will set aside clearly erroneous or unsupported factual findings).
In Re: Mh 2013-004303 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
In Re: Mh 2013-004303 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
See In re MH 2006- 000749, ¶ 1 (App. 2007).
In Re Mh2015-000579 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
In Re Mh2015-000579 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
See In re MH 2012-002480, ¶ 5 (App. 2013) (citing In re MH 2006-000749, ¶ 13 (App. 2007)).
In Re Mh2014-003678 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
In Re Mh2014-003678 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
¶5 Under these circumstances, and given the personal liberty interest at stake, In re MH 2006-000749, ¶ 14, the superior court was not “unreasoning and arbitrary” in refusing to delay the evidentiary hearing so that Appellant could retain private counsel.
In Re Mh 2014-003019 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
In Re Mh 2014-003019 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
at ¶ 13; In re MH 2006-000749, ¶ 14, see also In re MH-2008-000867, ¶ 4, (stating civil commitment is “a massive curtailment of liberty” and requires due process protection) (internal quotations marks and citation omitted).
In the Matter of Amanda G. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
In the Matter of Amanda G. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
In re MH 2006-000749, ¶ 30
In Re: Mh2013-001989 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
In Re: Mh2013-001989 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
See In re MH 2006–000749, ¶ 13
In re MH2012-002480 306 P.3d 78 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2013
In re MH2012-002480 306 P.3d 78 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2013
In re MH 2006-000749, ¶ 13
In Re Mh2011-000914 275 P.3d 611 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2012
In Re Mh2011-000914 275 P.3d 611 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2012
In re MH 2007-001236, ¶ 15 , ( ¶ 8 , In re MH 2006-000749, ¶ 13 , Little v. All Phoenix S. Cmty.
In Re Pima County Mental Health No. Mh3079411 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2011
In Re Pima County Mental Health No. Mh3079411 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2011
In re MH 2006-000749, quoting In re Coconino Cnty.
In Re Mh2010-002637 263 P.3d 82 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2011
In Re Mh2010-002637 263 P.3d 82 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2011
In re MH 2006-000749, ¶ 17
In Re Pima County Mental Health No. MH-2010-0047 263 P.3d 643 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2011
In Re Pima County Mental Health No. MH-2010-0047 263 P.3d 643 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2011
See In re Maricopa County Mental Health No. MH 2006-000749
State v. Lehr 254 P.3d 379 Ariz. 2011
State v. Lehr 254 P.3d 379 Ariz. 2011
¶12 Similarly unavailing is Lehr’s supplemental citation to In re MH 2006-000749, -25 ¶ 29, -08 (App. 2007).
In Re Pinal County Mental Health No. Mh-201000029 240 P.3d 1262 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2010
In Re Pinal County Mental Health No. Mh-201000029 240 P.3d 1262 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2010
In Re Mh Xxxx-Xxxxxx 229 P.3d 1012 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2010
In Re Mh Xxxx-Xxxxxx 229 P.3d 1012 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2010
§ 36-539 hearing); ¶ 27 , (waiver of the patient's right to be present at a hearing); ¶ 30 , (waiver of the right to counsel).
In re MH 2009-001264 229 P.3d 1012 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2010
In re MH 2009-001264 229 P.3d 1012 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2010
§ 36-539 hearing); In re MH 2006-000749, ¶27 , (waiver of the patient’s right to be present at a hearing); ¶ 30 , (waiver of the right to counsel).
Andrew R. v. Arizona Department of Economic Security 224 P.3d 950 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2010
Andrew R. v. Arizona Department of Economic Security 224 P.3d 950 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2010
See In re MH 2006-000749, -22, ¶ 17 , -05 (App.2007) (stating that we apply the plain meaning of a statute unless such an interpretation would lead to an absurd result or one at odds with the intent of the legislature (citing Resolution Trust Corp. v. W. Techs., Inc., , )).
In re MH 2008-000438 205 P.3d 1124 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2009
In Re Mh Xxxx-Xxxxxx 205 P.3d 1124 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2009
In re MH 2008-000438 205 P.3d 1124 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2009
¶ 8 , (citing In re *279 MH 2006-000749, ¶ 13 , ).
In Re Mh Xxxx-Xxxxxx 205 P.3d 1124 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2009
¶ 8 , (citing In re *1126 MH XXXX-XXXXXX, ¶ 13 , ).
In Re Mh Xxxx-Xxxxxx 204 P.3d 418 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2008
In re MH 2007-001236 204 P.3d 418 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2008
In re MH 2007-001236 204 P.3d 418 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2008
¶ 8 , In re MH 2006-000749, ¶ 13 , Little v. All Phoenix South Community Mental Health Center, Inc.
In Re Mh Xxxx-Xxxxxx 204 P.3d 418 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2008
¶ 8 , ¶ 13 , Little v. All Phoenix South Community Mental Health Center, Inc.
In re MH 2007-000629 197 P.3d 750 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2008

Explore

Outcomes

Cited by