Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite In re MH 2007-001264, 189 P.3d 1111.

26 citing documents.

In Re: Anna Marie J. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2025
In Re: Anna Marie J. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2025
See In re MH 2007–001264, ¶ 6 (App. 2008).
Ball v. Adhs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
Ball v. Adhs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
See In re MH 2007-001264, ¶ 5 (App. 2008); ¶ 8 (App. 2009).
State v. Cifuno Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
State v. Cifuno Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
See In re MH 2007-001264, ¶ 16, (holding argument not raised to the trial court is deemed waived).
In Re Mh2014-002674 358 P.3d 609 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
In Re Mh2014-002674 358 P.3d 609 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
In re MH 2007–001264, ¶ 6, see also A.R.S.
In the Matter of Larry B. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
In the Matter of Larry B. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
MH 2009- 001264, 224 Ariz. at 272, ¶ 7, 229 P.3d at 1014; In re MH 2007-001264, ¶ 16
In re MH2013-001564 322 P.3d 202 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
In re MH2013-001564 322 P.3d 202 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
In re MH 2007-001261, ¶ 6
Elizabeth W. v. State of Arizona 287 P.3d 821 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2012
Elizabeth W. v. State of Arizona 287 P.3d 821 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2012
See In re MH 2007- 001264, (“[T]he statutes pertaining to court-ordered treatment have been narrowly tailored by the legislature and must be strictly followed.”).
In Re Mh2010-002348 268 P.3d 392 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2011
In Re Mh2010-002348 268 P.3d 392 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2011
In re MH 2007-001264, ¶ 6
In Re Mh2010-002637 263 P.3d 82 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2011
In Re Mh2010-002637 263 P.3d 82 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2011
In doing so, we will “give meaning to each clause and consider the effects and consequences as well as the spirit and purpose of the law.” In re MH 2007-001264, ¶ 9 , ( , ).
In re MH 2008-001752 218 P.3d 1024 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2009
In re MH 2008-001752 218 P.3d 1024 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2009
3 ¶ 8 An individual subject to court-ordered treatment faces “a significant deprivation of liberty that requires due process protection.” In re MH 2007-001264, ¶ 6 , (quoting Addington v. Texas, 441 U.S. 418, 425 , 99 S.Ct.
In Re Mh Xxxx-Xxxxxx 213 P.3d 374 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2009
In Re Mh Xxxx-Xxxxxx 213 P.3d 374 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2009
¶ 6 , (quoting Addington v. Texas, 441 U.S. 418, 425 , 99 S.Ct.
In re MH 2008-000028 211 P.3d 1261 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2009
In Re Mh Xxxx-Xxxxxx 211 P.3d 1261 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2009
In Re Mh Xxxx-Xxxxxx 211 P.3d 1261 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2009
In re MH 2008-000028 211 P.3d 1261 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2009
In re MH 2007-001264, ¶ 6