Cited by

See In re MH2009-002120, ¶ 7 (App. 2010) (holding that a party that does not “bring [a] concern to the attention of opposing counsel or the superior court” has “waived the right to present it” on appeal).

Mental Health No. MH2009-002120, ¶ 7 (App. 2010) (“We generally do not consider issues, even constitutional issues, argued for the first time on appeal.”); n.7 ¶ 59 (2004) (stating that the invited error doctrine exists to prevent a party from injecting error into the record and then profiting from that err

See In re MH2009-002120, ¶ 7 (App. 2010).

FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND ¶2 “We view the facts in a light most favorable to upholding the court’s ruling.” In re MH2009-002120, ¶ 17 (App. 2010).

Mental Health No. MH 2009-002120

We “will not reverse an order for involuntary treatment unless it is ‘clearly erroneous and unsupported by any credible evidence.’” In re MH2009–002120, ¶ 17 (App. 2010) (citation omitted).

In re MH2009-002120, ¶ 17 (App. 2010).

2 “We view the facts in a light most favorable to upholding the court’s ruling.” In re MH2009-002120, ¶ 17 (App. 2010).

In re MH2009-002120, ¶ 17 (App. 2010).

See In re MH2009-002120, ¶ 17 (App. 2010).

§ 36-535(B); see also In re MH2009-002120, ¶ 17 (App. 2010).

See In re MH2009-002120, ¶¶ 15-16 (App. 2010) (holding, in context of court-ordered mental-health treatment under A.R.S.

See In re MH2009-002120, (party who leads court to take action may not assign action as error).

¶12 “We view the facts in a light most favorable to upholding the court’s ruling and will not reverse an order for involuntary treatment unless it is clearly erroneous and unsupported by any credible evidence.” In re MH 2009-002120, ¶ 17, (internal quotations omitted).

“We view the facts in a light most favorable to upholding the court’s ruling and will not reverse an order for involuntary treatment unless it is ‘clearly erroneous and unsupported by any credible evidence.’ ” In re MH 2009-002120, ¶ 17 , , 643 (App.2010) (internal citations omitted).