DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite In Re the Appeal in Maricopa County of Mental Health Case No. MH 94-00592, 897 P.2d 742.

70 citing documents.

  • In re MH 2008-001188 211 P.3d 1161 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2009
    In re Appeal in Maricopa County of Mental Health Case No. MH 94--00592
  • In Re Mh Xxxx-Xxxxxx 211 P.3d 1161 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2009
    In re Appeal in Maricopa County of Mental Health Case No. MH 94-00592
  • In re MH 2008-000438 205 P.3d 1124 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2009
  • In Re Mh Xxxx-Xxxxxx 212 P.3d 38 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2009
  • In re MH 2007-001895 212 P.3d 38 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2009
  • In Re Mh Xxxx-Xxxxxx 205 P.3d 1124 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2009
  • In re MH 2008-000438 205 P.3d 1124 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2009
    DISCUSSION ¶ 6 We will not disturb an order for treatment unless it is “clearly erroneous or unsupported by any credible evidence.” Mental Health Case No. MH 94-00592, , (citing Coconino County No. MH 1425, , ).
  • In Re Mh Xxxx-Xxxxxx 205 P.3d 1124 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2009
    Mental Health Case No. MH 94-00592, , (citing Coconino County No. MH 1425, , ).
  • In re MH 2007-001895 212 P.3d 38 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2009
    See Matter of Mental Health Case No. MH 94-00592, , (a trial court’s findings of fact “will not be set aside unless they are clearly erroneous or unsupported by any credible evidence”).
  • In Re Mh Xxxx-Xxxxxx 212 P.3d 38 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2009
    See Matter of Mental Health Case No. MH 94-00592, , (a trial court's findings of fact "will not be set aside unless they are clearly erroneous or unsupported by any credible evidence").
  • In Re Mh Xxxx-Xxxxxx 204 P.3d 418 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2008
  • In re MH 2007-001236 204 P.3d 418 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2008
  • In re MH 2007-001236 204 P.3d 418 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2008
    § 36-540; In re Mental Health Case No. MH 94-00592, , (“The clear and convincing standard is reserved for cases where substantial interests at stake require an extra measure of confidence by the fact finders in the correctness of their judgment.”) (internal quotations omitted).
  • In Re Mh Xxxx-Xxxxxx 204 P.3d 418 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2008
    § 36-540; In re Mental Health Case No. MH 94-00592, , ("The clear and convincing standard is reserved for cases where substantial interests at stake require an extra measure of confidence by the fact finders in the correctness of their judgment.") (internal quotations omitted).
  • In re MH 2006-000749 152 P.3d 1201 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2007
  • In re MH 2006-000749 152 P.3d 1201 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2007
    In re Maricopa County No. MH 94-00592
  • In Re Maricopa County Superior Court No. MH XXXX-XXXXXX 69 P.3d 1017 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2003
  • In Re Maricopa County Superior Court No. MH XXXX-XXXXXX 69 P.3d 1017 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2003
    Mental Health Case No. MH 94-00592
  • Mulleneaux v. State 950 P.2d 1156 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1997
  • Mulleneaux v. State 950 P.2d 1156 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1997
    Mental Health Case No. MH 94-00592