Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite State Ex Rel. Smith v. Conn, 98 P.3d 881.

25 citing documents.

State v. Munoz Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
State v. Munoz Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
County of Mohave, –99, ¶¶ 12–14 (App. 2004) (a defendant is entitled to notice of aggravating factors that the State intends to use at sentencing).
Olin Gene Taylor, John Adrian Johnson v. State of Arizona Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2006
Taylor v. Cruikshank 148 P.3d 84 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2006
Taylor v. Cruikshank 148 P.3d 84 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2006
Olin Gene Taylor, John Adrian Johnson v. State of Arizona Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2006
State v. Price 145 P.3d 647 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2006
State v. Price 145 P.3d 647 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2006
See State v. Superior Court (Tinnell), §§ 6-7
State v. Brown 115 P.3d 128 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2005
State v. Brown 115 P.3d 128 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2005
“[t]he issue[s] presented ...
State v. Johnson 111 P.3d 1038 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2005
State v. Johnson 111 P.3d 1038 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2005
State of Arizona v. Jesus Antonio Aleman Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2005
State of Arizona v. Jesus Antonio Aleman Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2005
(“aggravators that are now the functional equivalent of elements ‘need not be alleged in the charging document provided that the notice .
State v. Estrada 108 P.3d 261 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2005
State v. Estrada 108 P.3d 261 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2005
State v. Superior Court (Tinnell), ¶ 7
State v. Chiappetta 107 P.3d 366 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2005
State v. Chiappetta 107 P.3d 366 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2005
("Once authorized to sentence within the statutory range for aggravated sentences, the facts `legally essential to the punishment' have been found."), quoting Blakely, ___ U.S. at ___, 124 S.Ct.
State v. Timmons 103 P.3d 315 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2005
Criticized State v. Timmons 103 P.3d 315 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2005
State v. Resendis-Felix 100 P.3d 457 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2004
State v. Henderson 100 P.3d 911 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2004
State v. Henderson 100 P.3d 911 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2004
State v. Martinez 100 P.3d 30 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2004
State v. Martinez 100 P.3d 30 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2004
As we held in State v. Superior Court (Tinnell), ¶ 12 , (Ariz.App.