Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite Phoenix Newspapers, Inc. v. Ellis, 159 P.3d 578.

26 citing documents.

Gabriel Garibay v. Hon. Kellie Johnson William Fox, Az Constable Ethics Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2024
Gabriel Garibay v. Hon. Kellie Johnson William Fox, Az Constable Ethics Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2024
Khristina Lyn Shifflette v. Hon. Marner 534 P.3d 101 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2023
Khristina Lyn Shifflette v. Hon. Marner 534 P.3d 101 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2023
Jurisdiction ¶5 “‘Special action jurisdiction is appropriate when there is no plain, speedy and adequate remedy by way of appeal’ or ‘in cases involving a matter of first impression, statewide significance, or pure questions of law.’” Phoenix Newspapers, (quoting Roman Cath.
The State of Arizona v. Hon. Griffin Ryan Ahlersmeyer 526 P.3d 923 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2023
The State of Arizona v. Hon. Griffin Ryan Ahlersmeyer 526 P.3d 923 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2023
State of Arizona v. Hon. butler/valenzuela Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2021
State of Arizona v. Hon. butler/valenzuela Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2021
Newspapers, (quoting Roman Cath.
Conroy v. hutchinson/state Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
Conroy v. hutchinson/state Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
Newspapers, ¶ 13 (App. 2007).
State v. Godoy 418 P.3d 1100 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2017
State v. Godoy 418 P.3d 1100 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2017
Newspapers, Inc. v. Ellis , , ¶ 9, , 580 (App. 2007).
Beau Hodai v. the City of Tucson and Tucson Police Department 365 P.3d 959 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2016
Beau Hodai v. the City of Tucson and Tucson Police Department 365 P.3d 959 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2016
Newspapers, ¶¶ 22-23, -84 (App. 2007) (noting portions of document may be released if confidential information redacted).
McKee v. Peoria Unified School District 338 P.3d 994 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
McKee v. Peoria Unified School District 338 P.3d 994 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
Newspapers, ¶ 16, (quoting Griffis, 215 Ariz. at 4, ¶ 10, 156 P.3d at 421).
State of Arizona v. Justin James Chase 304 P.3d 1088 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2013
State of Arizona v. Justin James Chase 304 P.3d 1088 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2013
State ex rel. Montgomery v. Harris 301 P.3d 200 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2013
State ex rel. Montgomery v. Harris 301 P.3d 200 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2013
Schoeneweis v. Hamner 221 P.3d 48 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2009
Schoeneweis v. Hamner 221 P.3d 48 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2009
JURISDICTION AND STANDARD OF REVIEW ¶ 5 “ ‘Special action jurisdiction is appropriate when there is no plain, speedy and adequate remedy by way of appeal’ or ‘in cases involving a matter of first impression, statewide significance, or pure questions of law.’ ” Phoenix Newspapers, ¶ 9 , ( ¶ 2 , ).
Egan v. Fridlund-Horne 211 P.3d 1213 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2009
Egan v. Fridlund-Horne 211 P.3d 1213 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2009
See Phoenix Newspapers, ¶ 12
Lake v. City of Phoenix 207 P.3d 725 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2009
Lake v. City of Phoenix 207 P.3d 725 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2009
See Phoenix Newspapers, Inc., v. Ellis, ¶ 22 , (“It is incumbent upon the party arguing against disclosure to specifically demonstrate how production of the documents would violate rights of privacy or confidentiality, or would be detrimental to the best interests of the state.”) (citation omitted).