Cited by

¶ 9 (App. 2009), we appreciate our dissenting colleague voting not to do so.

v. Grant, ¶ 11 (App. 2009), whether a disclosure obligation exists or a privilege applies is a question of law that we review de novo.

¶ 11, (“[A] court abuses its discretion when it commits an error of law in reaching its decision or the record fails to provide ‘substantial support’ for the decision.” (citation omitted)).

Co. v. Grant, 222 Ariz. 507, ¶ 10

-12, ¶ 13 , -17 (App.2009) (indicating that “[tjrial courts regularly instruct juries to assess witnesses’ credibility” and then referencing an instruction permitting a jury to “accept everything a witness says, or part of it, or none of it”).