Cited by

see § 12-409(B)(5); CSA 13-101 Loop, LLC v. Loop 101, LLC, (recusal did not “taint [prior] rulings with the appearance of impropriety”); Jimenez v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., ¶¶ 16-17 (App. 2003) (subsequent recusal did not raise substantial question about

]” by basing her sentencing decision “on her personal experience” instead of “on the facts presented.” In support of this assertion, he cites the judge’s reference to her “17 years of experience” practicing juvenile law and her comment about other potential victims “who have yet to come forward.” ¶32 “Judicial officers are presumed to be free from bias or prejudice.” ¶ 12 (App. 2011).

¶ 6 (App. 2011) (“Issues involving pretrial incarceration and release conditions become moot once [the defendant is convicted and sentenced].”).

¶ 6 (App. 2011) (“Issues involving pretrial incarceration and release conditions become moot once a trial is conducted and any appeal can be filed.”).

“Issues involving pretrial incarceration and release conditions become moot once a trial is conducted and any appeal can be filed.” ¶ 6 (App. 2011).

lly restricted defendant’s pretrial rights to possess firearms because the release condition temporarily restricted 7 SAMIUDDIN V. NOTHWEHR (STATE) Opinion of the Court defendant’s right to bear arms only after the trial court found probable cause that defendant had committed a serious offense); ¶ 7 (App. 2011) (reviewing the trial court’s determination setting bond at $75 million for an abuse of discretion); cf. Block v. Rutherford, 468 U.S. 576, 584 (1984) (holding that a pretrial detention co

Inzunza-Ortega v. Superior Court (State), ¶ 7 , ¶ 6

“Issues involving pretrial incarceration and release conditions become moot once a trial is conducted and any appeal can be filed.” ¶ 6

Accordingly, , (real party in interest in special action “cannot seek affirmative relief via a response to a special action petition”).