Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite Steinberger v. McVey, 318 P.3d 419.

72 citing documents.

Delprete v. Ditech Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
This assertion, however, is contrary to established law that, under a deed of trust, “the trustee holds legal title until the loan balance is paid.” ¶ 65 (App. 2014) (citing A.R.S.
Conklin v. Medtronic 418 P.3d 912 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
Conklin v. Medtronic 418 P.3d 912 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
of Maricopa, ¶¶ 56–62 (App. 2014).
Stauffer v. Premier Service Mortgage, LLC 382 P.3d 790 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
Stauffer v. Premier Service Mortgage, LLC 382 P.3d 790 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
In contrast, P.3d 419 (App. 2014), the plaintiffs alleged a prima facie, good faith challenge to the foreclosing beneficiary’s chain of title.
Steelman v. US Bank Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
Steelman v. US Bank Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
Miller v. Fnma Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
Miller v. Fnma Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
of Maricopa, ¶ 42 (App. 2014).
Bank of America v. Allen Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
Bank of America v. Allen Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
April Abigail Guerra v. State of Arizona 348 P.3d 423 Ariz. 2015
April Abigail Guerra v. State of Arizona 348 P.3d 423 Ariz. 2015
137 ¶ 47, (collecting cases).
Armc 2011 v. Fennemore Craig Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
Armc 2011 v. Fennemore Craig Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
of Maricopa, ¶ 42, ARMC 2011 v. FENNEMORE CRAIG Decision of the Court 419, 430 (App. 2014).
Boisson v. Arizona Board of Regents 343 P.3d 931 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
Boisson v. Arizona Board of Regents 343 P.3d 931 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
See Fisher, 236 Ariz. at 75 n. 2 ¶ 9, 336 P.3d at 171 n. 2; , 139 ¶ 56, (noting negligence per se claim “must be based on a statute enacted ‘for the protection and safety of the public’ ”) (citation omitted).
Wilson v. Pnc Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
Wilson v. Pnc Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
of Maricopa, ¶ 50, (complaint asserting claim for “negligent performance of an undertaking” was legally sufficient to show economic harm when it listed “late fees, principal and interest accrual, damage to credit, retention of loan modification companies, and other harm”).
Kamela v. One West Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
Kamela v. One West Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
Wolfson v. B of a Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014