Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite HARRIS TRUST BANK OF AZ v. Superior Court, 933 P.2d 1227.

27 citing documents.

Nunez v. Valente Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2026
Thunderbird v. Hon. villa/phoenix Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2024
Thunderbird v. Hon. villa/phoenix Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2024
Williams v. Hon. myers/state Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2024
Williams v. Hon. myers/state Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2024
State v. Reyes 360 P.3d 100 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
State v. Reyes 360 P.3d 100 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
“The acceptance of special action jurisdiction is highly discretionary in this court” and “is not available where there is an equally plain, speedy, and adequate remedy by appeal.” Harris Trust Bank of Ariz. v. Superior Court (Mathes), , see Ariz. R.P.
Nunez v. Hon. porter/gordon Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
Nunez v. Hon. porter/gordon Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
(“[A]cceptance of special action jurisdiction is in the interests of judicial economy.”).
Romley v. Daughton 241 P.3d 518 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2010
Romley v. Daughton 241 P.3d 518 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2010
Mayer Unified School and Gadsen Elementary School v. Winkleman, Az State Land Dept... Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2008
Mayer Unified School and Gadsen Elementary School v. Winkleman, Az State Land Dept... Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2008
State v. Aguilar 178 P.3d 497 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2008
State v. Aguilar 178 P.3d 497 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2008
More specifically, “[w]hether a particular statute of limitations applies is a question of law, which we review de novo.” -63 , -31 (App.1996); , (we “independently review any questions of law relating to the statute of limitations defense”).
GRAND v. NACCHIO McMASTER And QWEST COMMUNICATIONS Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2006
GRAND v. NACCHIO McMASTER And QWEST COMMUNICATIONS Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2006
“The acceptance of special action jurisdiction is highly discretionary in this court” and “is not available where there is an equally plain, speedy, and adequate remedy by appeal.” Harris Trust Bank of Ariz. v. Superior Court , , see also Ariz. R. P. Spec.
Snyder v. Donato 118 P.3d 632 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2005
Snyder v. Donato 118 P.3d 632 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2005
Feld v. Gerst 66 P.3d 1268 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2003
Feld v. Gerst 66 P.3d 1268 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2003
Althaus v. Penn-America Ins. Co. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2002
Althaus v. Penn-America Ins. Co. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2002
Moore v. Browning 50 P.3d 852 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2002
Moore v. Browning 50 P.3d 852 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2002
(special action jurisdiction accepted in part because “error presented ...
Pompa v. SUPERIOR COURT IN & FOR MARICOPA 931 P.2d 431 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1997
Pompa v. SUPERIOR COURT IN & FOR MARICOPA 931 P.2d 431 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1997
Jurisdiction is generally accepted only in those cases in which “justice cannot be satisfactorily obtained by other means.” King, 138 Ariz. at 149 , 673 P.2d at 789