Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite State Compensation Fund v. Superior Court, 948 P.2d 499.

74 citing documents.

Marketech v. Process Service Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2025
Marketech v. Process Service Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2025
(“Special action jurisdiction is appropriate because .
Wallschlaeger v. the Hogle Firm Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
Wallschlaeger v. the Hogle Firm Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
Carter Oil v. Ador Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
Carter Oil v. Ador Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
Fund v. Superior Court (EnerGCorp, Inc.), -76 (App. 1997)); ("A well established rule of statutory construction provides that the expression of one or more items of a class indicates an intent to exclude all items of the same class which are not expressed.").
Arizona Electric Power Cooperative, Inc. v. Arizona Department of Revenue 393 P.3d 146 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
Aepco v. Ador Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
Arizona Electric Power Cooperative, Inc. v. Arizona Department of Revenue 393 P.3d 146 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
Fund v. Superior Court (EnerGCorp, Inc.), -76 , -04 (App. 1997) ( , , ).
Aepco v. Ador Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
Fund v. Superior Court (EnerGCorp, Inc.), -76, -04 (App. 1997) ( ).
Wells Fargo v. Hoag Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
Wells Fargo v. Hoag Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
of Maricopa (EnerGCorp, Inc.), (citation omitted).
Tessler v. Progressive Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
Tessler v. Progressive Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
Fund v. Superior Court (Hauser), - 75 (App. 1997)).
Allen v. scf/morris Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
Allen v. scf/morris Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
3 we held that the state compensation fund was a public entity subject to the claims statute, but we noted, “[t]he creation of the compensation law and the compensation fund therein was legislative.
Wagoner v. Aleman Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
Wagoner v. Aleman Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
Bmo v. Reid Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
Bmo v. Reid Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
Pivotal Colorado II, LLC v. Arizona Public Safety Personnel Retirement System 322 P.3d 186 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
Pivotal Colorado II, LLC v. Arizona Public Safety Personnel Retirement System 322 P.3d 186 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
Fund v. Superior Court (EnerGCorp, Inc.)
Adams v. COM'N ON APPELLATE CT. APPOINTMENTS 254 P.3d 367 Ariz. 2011
Adams v. COM'N ON APPELLATE CT. APPOINTMENTS 254 P.3d 367 Ariz. 2011
Fund v. Superior Court (EnerGCorp, Inc.), (“The provision of one exemption in a statute implicitly denies the existence of other unstated exemptions.”) ( (“[T]he expression of one or mor
Hahn v. INDUSTRIAL COM'N OF ARIZONA 252 P.3d 1036 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2011
Hahn v. INDUSTRIAL COM'N OF ARIZONA 252 P.3d 1036 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2011
Fund v. Superior Court (Hauser), -75 , -03 (App.1997).
Home Builders Ass'n of Cent. Ariz. v. Kard 199 P.3d 629 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2008
Home Builders Ass'n of Cent. Ariz. v. Kard 199 P.3d 629 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2008
Fund v. Superior Ct. (EnerGCorp.Inc.)
In re MH 2007-000937 189 P.3d 1090 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2008
In re MH 2007-000937 189 P.3d 1090 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2008
Fund v. Superior Court (EnerGCorp, Inc.), , (“The provision of one exemption in a statute implicitly denies the existence of other unstated exemptions.”) (citation omitted).
UNITED DAIRYMEN OF ARIZONA v. Rawlings 177 P.3d 334 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2008
UNITED DAIRYMEN OF ARIZONA v. Rawlings 177 P.3d 334 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2008
National Bank of Arizona v. Thruston 180 P.3d 977 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2008
National Bank of Arizona v. Thruston 180 P.3d 977 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2008
Arizona Health Care Cost Containment System v. Allen 173 P.3d 448 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2007
Arizona Health Care Cost Containment System v. Allen 173 P.3d 448 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2007
Save Our Valley Ass'n v. Arizona Corp. Commission 165 P.3d 194 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2007
Save Our Valley Ass'n v. Arizona Corp. Commission 165 P.3d 194 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2007
Gorman v. State ex rel. Owens 155 P.3d 1054 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2007
Gorman v. State ex rel. Owens 155 P.3d 1054 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2007
State ex rel. Department of Economic Security v. Demetz 130 P.3d 986 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2006
State ex rel. Department of Economic Security v. Demetz 130 P.3d 986 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2006
Fund v. Superior Court (EnerGCorp, Inc.), -75 , -03 (App.1997).
Salerno v. Espinoza 115 P.3d 626 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2005
Salerno v. Espinoza 115 P.3d 626 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2005
Fund v. Superior Court (EnerGCorp, Inc.), , , (App.1997) (“[N]o action may be maintained when a plaintiff has failed to file a timely, sufficient notice of claim ...
Primary Consultants, L.L.C. v. Maricopa County Recorder 111 P.3d 435 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2005
Primary Consultants, L.L.C. v. Maricopa County Recorder 111 P.3d 435 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2005
In Re Estate of Jung 109 P.3d 97 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2005
In Re Estate of Jung 109 P.3d 97 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2005
Ct., -75 , -03 (App.1997).
Maycock v. Asilomar Development, Inc. 88 P.3d 565 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2004
Maycock v. Asilomar Development, Inc. 88 P.3d 565 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2004