Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite Arizona Department of Revenue v. Ormond Builders, Inc., 166 P.3d 934.

42 citing documents.

Nicaise v. ades/sundaram Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2025
Nicaise v. ades/sundaram Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2025
See Ariz. Dep't of Revenue v. Ormond Builders, Inc., n.7 (App. 2007) ("We will not address arguments raised for the first time in the reply brief.").
Arizona Cardinals v. Ador Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2025
Arizona Cardinals v. Ador Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2025
See Ariz. Dep’t of Revenue v. Ormond Builders, Inc., ¶ 19 (App. 2007) (distinguishing how “the [TPT] statutes do not address the legal relationship between a principal and an agent,” but is apparent in “the relationships among [the parties]” themselves).
Dove Mountain v. Ador Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
Dove Mountain v. Ador Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
Ariz. Dep't of Revenue v. Ormond Builders, Inc., ¶ 15 (App. 2007).
Goodrich v. Haeussler Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
Goodrich v. Haeussler Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
See Ariz. Dep't of Revenue v. Ormond Builders, Inc., ¶ 24 n.7 (App. 2007) ("We will not address arguments raised for the first time in the reply brief.").
AMY PURDY v. HON. D. DOUGLAS METCALF Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2021
AMY PURDY v. HON. D. DOUGLAS METCALF Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2021
See Ariz. Dep’t of Revenue v. Ormond Builders, Inc., n.7 (App. 2007).
Aspen v. Wakefield Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
Aspen v. Wakefield Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
ADOR v. Ormand Builders, Inc., n.7 (App. 2007) (issues raised for first time in reply brief are waived).
Swift v. Ador Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
Swift v. Ador Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
Ariz. Dep’t of Revenue v. Ormond Builders, Inc., n.7 (App. 2007).
Ohmstedt v. Ohmstedt Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
Ohmstedt v. Ohmstedt Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
Ariz. Dep’t of Revenue v. Ormond Builders, Inc., ¶ 24 n.7 (App. 2007) (“We will not address arguments raised for the first time in the reply brief.”).
Rodney L., Deana L. v. Dcs, J.L. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
Rodney L., Deana L. v. Dcs, J.L. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
See Ariz. Dep’t of Revenue v. Ormond Builders, Inc.
Vangilder v. Pinal County Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
Vangilder v. Pinal County Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
See ADOR v. Ormond Builders, Inc., ¶¶ 44-45 (App. 2007).
Pearce v. Yuma Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
Pearce v. Yuma Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
¶ 8 (App. 2001) (finding that a failure to raise an issue with the trial court waives the issue on appeal); Jimenez v. Sears, Roebuck & Co., n.9 (1995) (noting a “rare exception” to the waiver rule 2 See, n.1, ¶ 8 (App. 2008) (citing Ariz. Dep’t of Revenue v. Ormond Builders, Inc., n.7 (App. 2007)).
Jessyca P., Bradon P. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
Jessyca P., Bradon P. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
See Ariz. Dep't of Revenue v. Ormond Builders, Inc., ¶ 24, n.7 (App. 2007).
Klp v. Ador Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
Klp v. Ador Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
We also review de novo “the tax court’s construction of statutes and findings that combine facts and law.” Ariz. Dep’t of Revenue 3 KLP ENTERPRISES v. ARIZONA DEPT. OF REVENUE Decision of the Court v. Ormond Builders, Inc., ¶ 15
Home Depot U.S.A., Inc. v. Arizona Department of Revenue 314 P.3d 576 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2013
Home Depot U.S.A., Inc. v. Arizona Department of Revenue 314 P.3d 576 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2013
Ariz. Dep’t of Revenue v. Ormond Builders, Inc., ¶ 15
First Data Corp. v. Arizona Department of Revenue 313 P.3d 548 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2013
First Data Corp. v. Arizona Department of Revenue 313 P.3d 548 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2013
Ariz. Dep’t of Revenue v. Ormond Builders, Inc., ¶ 15
Scottsdale Princess Partnership v. Maricopa County 286 P.3d 174 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2012
Scottsdale Princess Partnership v. Maricopa County 286 P.3d 174 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2012
¶ 10 We review de novo “the tax court’s construction of statutes and findings that combine facts and law,” but review its factual findings for “clear error.” Ariz. Dep’t of Revenue v. Ormond Builders, Inc., ¶ 15
Microchip Technology Inc. v. State 283 P.3d 34 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2012
Microchip Technology Inc. v. State 283 P.3d 34 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2012
Ariz. Dep’t of Revenue v. Ormond Builders, Inc., ¶ 15
Rigel Corp. v. State 234 P.3d 633 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2010
Rigel Corp. v. State 234 P.3d 633 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2010
Ariz. Dep’t of Revenue v. Ormond Builders, Inc., ¶ 15
Arizona Department of Revenue v. Central Newspapers, Inc. 218 P.3d 1083 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2009
Arizona Department of Revenue v. Central Newspapers, Inc. 218 P.3d 1083 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2009
Ariz. Dep’t of Revenue v. Ormond Builders, Inc., ¶ 15
In Re Guardianship of Pacheco 199 P.3d 676 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2008
In Re Guardianship of Pacheco 199 P.3d 676 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2008
See Ariz. Dep't of Revenue v. Ormond Builders, Inc., n. 7 , , 940 n. 7 (App.2007) (arguments not raised in opening brief waived on appeal).
Marco C. v. Sean C. & Colleen C. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2008
Marco C. v. Sean C. & Colleen C. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2008
Ariz. Dep’t of Revenue v. Ormond Builders, Inc., n.7, n.7 (App. 2007).