Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite Sierra Tucson, Inc. v. Pima County, 871 P.2d 762.

29 citing documents.

Vangilder v. Pinal County Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
Vangilder v. Pinal County Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
“[R]eference to established, respected dictionaries is appropriate in determining the commonly accepted meaning of words.” Sierra Tucson, ().
Shepherd v. Costco 441 P.3d 989 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
Shepherd v. Costco 441 P.3d 989 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
¶30 Webster’s Second Unabridged Dictionary defines good faith, in the general sense, as “accordance with standards of honesty, trust, sincerity, etc..” Random House Webster’s Second Unabridged Dictionary 822 (2001); see Sierra Tucson, (citing same dictionary).
Stambaugh v. Butler 379 P.3d 250 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
Lewis v. Debord and Nelson-Debord 335 P.3d 1136 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2014
Lewis v. Debord and Nelson-Debord 335 P.3d 1136 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2014
ML Servicing Co. v. Coles 334 P.3d 745 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
ML Servicing Co. v. Coles 334 P.3d 745 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
Marisol Metzler v. Bci Coca-Cola Bottling Co. of Los Angeles 310 P.3d 9 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2013
Marisol Metzler v. Bci Coca-Cola Bottling Co. of Los Angeles 310 P.3d 9 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2013
“In interpreting the meaning of a statute, we seek to discern the legislature’s intent, looking primarily to the statutory language and giving effect to statutory terms in accordance with their commonly accepted meanings.” Sierra Tucson, see also A.R.S.
Tumacacori Mission Land Development, Ltd. v. Union Pacific Railroad Co. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2011
Tumacacori Mission Land Development, Ltd. v. Union Pacific Railroad Co. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2011
State of Arizona v. Dean William Zinsmeyer Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2009
State of Arizona v. Dean William Zinsmeyer Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2009
In Re Andrew C. 160 P.3d 687 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2007
In Re Andrew C. 160 P.3d 687 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2007
Sierra Tucson, , (“reference to established, respected dictionaries is appropriate in determining the commonly accepted meaning of words in a statute”).
State v. Hoggatt 18 P.3d 1239 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2001
State v. Hoggatt 18 P.3d 1239 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2001
We will give an undefined word or phrase “its ordinary meaning unless it appears from the context or otherwise that a different meaning is intended.” Sierra Tucson
State v. Flynt 13 P.3d 1209 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2000
State v. Flynt 13 P.3d 1209 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2000
In Re Paul M. 7 P.3d 131 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2000
In Re Paul M. 7 P.3d 131 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2000
.” Sierra Tucson, , see also Mail Boxes.
Little v. ALL PHOENIX S. COM. MENT. HLTH. 919 P.2d 1368 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1996
Little v. ALL PHOENIX S. COM. MENT. HLTH. 919 P.2d 1368 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1996
Little v. All Phoenix South Community Mental Health Center, Inc. 919 P.2d 1368 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1995
Little v. All Phoenix South Community Mental Health Center, Inc. 919 P.2d 1368 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1995
“[Reference to established, respected dictionaries is appropriate in determining the commonly accepted meaning of words in a statute.” Sierra Tucson
State v. Sanchez 892 P.2d 212 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1995
State v. Sanchez 892 P.2d 212 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1995