Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite Brink Electric Construction Co. v. Arizona Department of Revenue, 909 P.2d 421.

68 citing documents.

Aida Renta Trust v. Department of Revenue 3 P.3d 1142 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2000
Aida Renta Trust v. Department of Revenue 3 P.3d 1142 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2000
46, 51 , aff'd , see also General Motors Corp., 189 Ariz. at 93 , 938 P.2d at 488 (income taxation); Brink Electric Const. Co. v. Arizona Dep’t of Revenue, , (contracting excise); , (municipal excise on telecommunications business); Tucson Mechanical Contracting, Inc. v. Arizona Dep’t of Revenue, , (App.1
State Ex Rel. Arizona Department of Revenue v. Capitol Castings, Inc. 970 P.2d 443 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1998
State Ex Rel. Arizona Department of Revenue v. Capitol Castings, Inc. 970 P.2d 443 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1998
Const. Co. v. Arizona Dep’t of Revenue
Samaritan Health System v. Caldwell 957 P.2d 1373 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1998
Samaritan Health System v. Caldwell 957 P.2d 1373 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1998
Matter of Estate of Dobert 963 P.2d 327 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1998
Matter of Estate of Dobert 963 P.2d 327 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1998
Faz v. Ford Motor Credit Co. 953 P.2d 935 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1997
Faz v. Ford Motor Credit Co. 953 P.2d 935 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1997
Co. v. Arizona Dep’t of Revenue
ADVO System, Inc. v. City of Phoenix 942 P.2d 1187 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1997
ADVO System, Inc. v. City of Phoenix 942 P.2d 1187 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1997
Centric-Jones Co. v. Town of Marana 937 P.2d 654 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1996
Centric-Jones Co. v. Town of Marana 937 P.2d 654 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1996
Const. Co. v. Arizona Dep’t of Revenue, , (interpreting analogous provisions of A.R.S.
Valencia Energy Co. v. Arizona Department of Revenue 938 P.2d 474 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1996
Valencia Energy Co. v. Arizona Department of Revenue 938 P.2d 474 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1996
IRBY Construction Co v. Arizona Department of Revenue 907 P.2d 74 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1995
IRBY Construction Co v. Arizona Department of Revenue 907 P.2d 74 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1995
Co. v. Arizona Dep’t of Revenue, , this case falls within an exception to the doctrine of collateral estoppel because the application of that doctrine will result in the unequal administration of the law upon other taxpayers who are engaged in the business of constructing transmission lines.