Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite Walden Books Co. v. Arizona Department of Revenue, 12 P.3d 809.

52 citing documents.

Glava v. Jpmorgan Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
Glava v. Jpmorgan Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
See ARCAP 28(c) (2014); n.3, n.3 (1985) (determining ARCAP 28(c) prohibits citation to unpublished federal court decisions); Walden Books Co. v. Dep’t of Revenue, ¶ 23, (holding ARCAP 28(c) prohibits citation to out-of-state memorandum decisions); see also Ariz. R. Sup.
McQuality v. Martin Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
McQuality v. Martin Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
.”); see also Walden Books Co. v. Dep’t of Revenue, ¶ 21, (“ARCAP 28(c) makes it improper to cite unpublished decisions as authority.”).
Koss Corp. v. American Express Co. 309 P.3d 898 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2013
Koss Corp. v. American Express Co. 309 P.3d 898 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2013
See ARCAP 28(c); Walden Books Co. v. Ariz. Dep’t of Rev., ¶ 23
McMurtry v. Weatherford Hotel, Inc. 293 P.3d 520 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2013
McMurtry v. Weatherford Hotel, Inc. 293 P.3d 520 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2013
See Walden Books Co. v. Dep’t of Revenue, ¶ 23 , (holding that Arizona Rule of Civil Appellate Procedure 28(c), which generally prohibits citation of unpublished decisions, is applicable to "memorandum decisions from any court”).
Independent Mortgage Co. v. Alaburda 281 P.3d 1049 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2012
Independent Mortgage Co. v. Alaburda 281 P.3d 1049 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2012
See Walden Books Co. v. Dep’t of Revenue, ¶¶ 22-23 , (rule prohibiting citation of memorandum decisions applies to memorandum decisions by any court).
Mangan v. Mangan 258 P.3d 164 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2011
Mangan v. Mangan 258 P.3d 164 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2011
See Walden Books Co. v. Ariz. Dep’t of Revenue, ¶¶ 20-23
Planning Group of Scottsdale, L.L.C. v. Lake Mathews Mineral Properties, Ltd. 230 P.3d 365 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2010
Planning Group of Scottsdale, L.L.C. v. Lake Mathews Mineral Properties, Ltd. 230 P.3d 365 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2010
Walden Books Co. v. Ariz. Dep’t of Revenue, ¶ 23
AZTAR CORP. v. US Fire Ins. Co. 224 P.3d 960 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2010
AZTAR CORP. v. US Fire Ins. Co. 224 P.3d 960 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2010
Qwest Corp. v. City of Chandler 217 P.3d 424 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2009
Qwest Corp. v. City of Chandler 217 P.3d 424 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2009
See Arizona Rules of Civil Appellate Procedure 28(c)
AIDA RENTA TRUST v. Maricopa County 212 P.3d 941 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2009
AIDA RENTA TRUST v. Maricopa County 212 P.3d 941 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2009
See ARCAP 28(c); Walden Books Co. v. Dep’t of Revenue, ¶¶21-23
Calpine Construction Finance Co. v. Arizona Depatment of Revenue 211 P.3d 1228 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2009
Calpine Construction Finance Co. v. Arizona Depatment of Revenue 211 P.3d 1228 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2009
111(e); Walden Books Co. v. Ariz. Dep’t of Revenue, ¶¶ 20-23
Enterprise Leasing Co. v. Arizona Department of Revenue 211 P.3d 1 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2008
Enterprise Leasing Co. v. Arizona Department of Revenue 211 P.3d 1 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2008
John M. v. Ades, Shannon M. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2007
John M. v. Ades, Shannon M. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2007
App. P.); see also Walden Books Co. v. Dep’t of Revenue, ¶¶ 20-23, (discussion of rule).
Arizona Department of Revenue v. Ormond Builders, Inc. 166 P.3d 934 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2007
Arizona Department of Revenue v. Ormond Builders, Inc. 166 P.3d 934 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2007
See Walden Books Co. v. Dep’t of Rev., , 586 n. 3, ¶ 6, , 811 n. 3 (App.2000) (holding the same for the retail classification).
Karbal v. Arizona Department of Revenue 158 P.3d 243 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2007
Karbal v. Arizona Department of Revenue 158 P.3d 243 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2007
Because Long was not published, see Walden Books Co. v. Dep’t of Revenue, ¶ 23 , and standing was not discussed in the subsequent appeal.
Hall v. Smith Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2007
Hall v. Smith Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2007
See Walden Books Co. v. Dep’t of Revenue, ¶¶ 20-23
Gary Filer v. Tohono O'Odham Nation Gaming Enterprise Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2006
Gary Filer v. Tohono O'Odham Nation Gaming Enterprise Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2006
Additionally, a plaintiff who files a dram shop action pursuant to § 4-311 is statutorily required to “file a copy of the complaint with the department [of liquor licenses and control] Revenue, n.3, n.3 (1985).
Chaurasia v. General Motors Corp. 126 P.3d 165 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2006
Chaurasia v. General Motors Corp. 126 P.3d 165 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2006
See Walden Books Co. v. Dep’t of Revenue, ¶ 20
Jeter v. Mayo Clinic Arizona 121 P.3d 1256 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2005
Jeter v. Mayo Clinic Arizona 121 P.3d 1256 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2005
Arizona Rule of Civil Appellate Procedure 28(c); ¶ 23
Abdulkadir Hourani v. Benson Hospital Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2005
Abdulkadir Hourani v. Benson Hospital Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2005
See Walden Books Co. v. Dep’t of Revenue, (rule prohibiting citation of memorandum decisions applies to memorandum decisions by any court).
DaimlerChrysler Services North America, LLC v. Arizona Department of Revenue 110 P.3d 1031 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2005
DaimlerChrysler Services North America, LLC v. Arizona Department of Revenue 110 P.3d 1031 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2005
State v. Henderson 100 P.3d 911 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2004
State v. Henderson 100 P.3d 911 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2004
¶ 23 , applies to memorandum decision from any court").
Burke v. Az State Retirement Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2003
Burke v. Az State Retirement Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2003
Walden Books Co. v. Dep’t of Revenue, P.3d 809 (App. 2000).
Energy Squared, Inc. v. Arizona Department of Revenue 56 P.3d 686 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2002
Energy Squared, Inc. v. Arizona Department of Revenue 56 P.3d 686 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2002
¶26 ¶ 18 , for the proposition that services such as the taxpayer’s that cannot stand alone as a business activity will not be treated as separate from related taxable activity for transaction privilege tax purposes.
Simat Corp. v. Arizona Health Care Cost Containment System 56 P.3d 28 Ariz. 2002
Simat Corp. v. Arizona Health Care Cost Containment System 56 P.3d 28 Ariz. 2002
Our court of appeals discussed memorandum decisions and said, "We find no reason for out-of-state memorandum decisions to be more citable than in-state memorandum decisions.” Walden Books Co. v. Dep’t of Revenue, , 589 ¶ 23, , 814 ¶ 23 (App.2000).

Explore

Outcomes

Cited by