Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite Prebula v. Arizona Department of Economic Security, 672 P.2d 978.

38 citing documents.

Dynometrics v. ades/enriquez Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2024
Dynometrics v. ades/enriquez Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2024
Sec., n.4 (App. 1983) (“[T]he appeals board is not bound by the factual findings of the appeal tribunal and may make additional or contrary findings of fact.”).
Montalbano v. ades/adrenaline Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2024
Montalbano v. ades/adrenaline Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2024
Jd Medical v. ades/roach Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
Jd Medical v. ades/roach Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
Tri-State v. ades/mccarley Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
Tri-State v. ades/mccarley Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
Sec., (noting that the Board’s decision will be affirmed “if it is supported by any reasonable interpretation of the record”).
Jm Homes v. Empire Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
Jm Homes v. Empire Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
Dodge v. Lake Havasu Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
Dodge v. Lake Havasu Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
Cooke v. Arizona Department of Economic Security 302 P.3d 666 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2013
Cooke v. Arizona Department of Economic Security 302 P.3d 666 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2013
Golob v. ARIZONA MEDICAL BD. OF STATE 176 P.3d 703 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2008
Golob v. ARIZONA MEDICAL BD. OF STATE 176 P.3d 703 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2008
Baca v. Arizona Department of Economic Security 951 P.2d 1235 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1998
Baca v. Arizona Department of Economic Security 951 P.2d 1235 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1998
In addition, we view the evidence in a light most favorable to upholding the Board’s decision and “will affirm that decision if it is supported by any reasonable interpretation of the record.”
Golden Eagle Distributors, Inc. v. Arizona Department of Economic Security 885 P.2d 1130 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1994
Golden Eagle Distributors, Inc. v. Arizona Department of Economic Security 885 P.2d 1130 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1994
Avila v. Arizona Dep’t of Economic Sec., , Prebula v. *567 Arizona Dep’t of Economic Sec.
Weller v. Arizona Department of Economic Security 860 P.2d 487 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1993
Weller v. Arizona Department of Economic Security 860 P.2d 487 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1993
Castaneda v. Arizona Dep’t of Economic Sec., , Prebula v. Arizona Dep’t of Economic Sec.
Murray v. Arizona Department of Economic Security 844 P.2d 1171 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1992
Murray v. Arizona Department of Economic Security 844 P.2d 1171 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1992
Castaneda v. Arizona Department of Economic Security 815 P.2d 418 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1991
Castaneda v. Arizona Department of Economic Security 815 P.2d 418 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1991
Munguia, supra; Prebula v. Arizona Dep’t of Economic Sec.
Ross v. Arizona Department of Economic Security 829 P.2d 318 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1991
Ross v. Arizona Department of Economic Security 829 P.2d 318 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1991
Prebula v. Arizona Dep’t of Economic Sec., , (citations omitted).
Pettypool v. Arizona Department of Economic Security 777 P.2d 230 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1989
Pettypool v. Arizona Department of Economic Security 777 P.2d 230 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1989
Avila v. Arizona Department of Economic Security 772 P.2d 600 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1989
Avila v. Arizona Department of Economic Security 772 P.2d 600 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1989
Munguia, 159 Ariz. at 159 , 765 P.2d at 561
Munguia v. Department of Economic Security 765 P.2d 559 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1988
Munguia v. Department of Economic Security 765 P.2d 559 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1988
Orr v. Arizona Department of Economic Security 761 P.2d 1085 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1988
Orr v. Arizona Department of Economic Security 761 P.2d 1085 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1988
Anderson v. Arizona Department of Economic Security 727 P.2d 845 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1986
Anderson v. Arizona Department of Economic Security 727 P.2d 845 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1986
which held: On appeal, this court views the evidence in a light most favorable to upholding the decision of the appeals board and will affirm that decision if it is supported by any reasonable interpretation of the record.