Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite Weller v. Arizona Department of Economic Security, 860 P.2d 487.

28 citing documents.

Williams v. ades/lamont Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2025
Williams v. ades/lamont Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2025
Montalbano v. ades/adrenaline Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2024
Montalbano v. ades/adrenaline Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2024
Sec., and the employer has the burden to prove that the misconduct justifying discharge was indeed disqualifying, A.A.C.
Abebe v. Ades Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
Abebe v. Ades Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
Johnsen v. ades/des Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
Johnsen v. ades/des Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
Simmons v. Ades Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
Simmons v. Ades Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
Pascarella v. Mesa Police Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
Pascarella v. Mesa Police Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
Chandler v. Rancho Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
Chandler v. Rancho Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
Figueroa v. Arizona Department of Economic Security 260 P.3d 1113 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2011
Figueroa v. Arizona Department of Economic Security 260 P.3d 1113 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2011
Sec., , (finding that the question whether an employer has met its burden of proof is “a question of law freely reviewable by this court”); Castaneda v. Ariz. Dep’t of Econ.
Hosea v. City of Phoenix Fire Pension Board 229 P.3d 257 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2010
Hosea v. City of Phoenix Fire Pension Board 229 P.3d 257 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2010
State v. Lucero 85 P.3d 1059 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2004
State v. Lucero 85 P.3d 1059 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2004
In re Jonah T. 994 P.2d 1019 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1999
In re Jonah T. 994 P.2d 1019 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1999
State v. Hammonds 968 P.2d 601 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1998
State v. Hammonds 968 P.2d 601 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1998
Hart v. Seven Resorts Inc. 947 P.2d 846 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1997
Hart v. Seven Resorts Inc. 947 P.2d 846 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1997
Sec., , we cited the right to privacy in support of a holding that an employee, discharged after a drug test revealed trace amounts of marijuana in his system, was entitled to unemployment benefits.
Golden Eagle Distributors, Inc. v. Arizona Department of Economic Security 885 P.2d 1130 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1994
Golden Eagle Distributors, Inc. v. Arizona Department of Economic Security 885 P.2d 1130 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1994