Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite State v. Parsons, 222 P.2d 637.

41 citing documents.

State v. Kamai 911 P.2d 626 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1995
State v. Kamai 911 P.2d 626 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1995
which held that joyriding is not a lesser included offense of auto theft.
Rolph v. City Court of City of Mesa 618 P.2d 1081 Ariz. 1980
Rolph v. City Court of City of Mesa 618 P.2d 1081 Ariz. 1980
State v. Estrada, 27 Ariz.App.
State v. Gray 595 P.2d 990 Ariz. 1979
State v. Dailey 596 P.2d 716 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1979
State v. Dailey 596 P.2d 716 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1979
State v. Cain 555 P.2d 1129 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1976
State v. Cain 555 P.2d 1129 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1976
Our Supreme Court emphasized that theft required an intent to permanently deprive the owner of its use, and stated: “ ‘[The joyriding statute] defines a crime separate and distinct from and not necessarily related to theft.’” , quoting People v. Tellez, 32 Cal.App.2d 217
State v. McClarity 557 P.2d 170 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1976
State v. McClarity 557 P.2d 170 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1976
P.2d 637 (1950), State v. Batt, 24 Ariz.App.
State v. Estrada 552 P.2d 772 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1976
State v. Estrada 552 P.2d 772 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1976
In re Appeal in Maricopa County, Juvenile Action No. J-75755, , , Peterson v. Jacobson, 2 Ariz.App.
In Re the Appeal in Marcopa County, Juvenile Action No. J-75755 523 P.2d 1304 Ariz. 1974
In Re the Appeal in Marcopa County, Juvenile Action No. J-75755 523 P.2d 1304 Ariz. 1974
Peterson v. Jacobson, 2 Ariz.App.
In Re the Appeal in Maricopa County, Juvenile Action No. J-75755 521 P.2d 641 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1974
In Re the Appeal in Maricopa County, Juvenile Action No. J-75755 521 P.2d 641 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1974
Peterson v. Jacobson, 2 Ariz.App.
State v. Postell 510 P.2d 749 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1973
State v. Postell 510 P.2d 749 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1973
State v. Woody 496 P.2d 584 Ariz. 1972
State v. Woody 496 P.2d 584 Ariz. 1972
Peterson v. Jacobson, 2 Ariz.App.
State v. Garcia 484 P.2d 229 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1971
State v. Garcia 484 P.2d 229 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1971
State v. Wood, 7 Ariz.App.
State v. Wood 435 P.2d 857 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1967
State v. Wood 435 P.2d 857 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1967
State v. Zaragosa 430 P.2d 426 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1967
State v. Zaragosa 430 P.2d 426 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1967
Arizona State Tax Commission v. First Bank Building Corp. 429 P.2d 481 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1967
Arizona State Tax Commission v. First Bank Building Corp. 429 P.2d 481 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1967
State v. Jackson 420 P.2d 270 Ariz. 1966
State v. Jackson 420 P.2d 270 Ariz. 1966
: “Grand theft requires a specific felonious intent to deprive the owner permanently of his property, , 196 P. 159 ; , , whereas the specific intent required for the misdemeanor of using a vehicle without the consent of the owner is
Peterson v. Jacobson 411 P.2d 31 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1966
Peterson v. Jacobson 411 P.2d 31 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1966
State v. Cobb 406 P.2d 421 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1965
State v. Cobb 406 P.2d 421 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1965
State v. Perez 383 P.2d 745 Ariz. 1963
State v. Perez 383 P.2d 745 Ariz. 1963
80 P. 389 ; Rule 295, Rules of Criminal Procedure, 17 A.R.S.
State v. Evans 356 P.2d 1106 Ariz. 1960
State v. Evans 356 P.2d 1106 Ariz. 1960
State v. Hoffman 279 P.2d 898 Ariz. 1955
State v. Hoffman 279 P.2d 898 Ariz. 1955
State v. Parsons, 1950, , .