Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite State v. Thomas, 229 P.2d 246.

32 citing documents.

State v. Harrington Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
State v. Harrington Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
(admission “of evidence as to other unrelated, independent offenses” is reversible error).
State v. Denny 555 P.2d 111 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1976
State v. Denny 555 P.2d 111 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1976
State Ex Rel. Pope v. Superior Court 545 P.2d 946 Ariz. 1976
State Ex Rel. Pope v. Superior Court 545 P.2d 946 Ariz. 1976
State v. Dodds 537 P.2d 970 Ariz. 1975
State v. Dodds 537 P.2d 970 Ariz. 1975
in support of his position, but these cases are not on point.
State v. Jaramillo 522 P.2d 1079 Ariz. 1974
State v. Jaramillo 522 P.2d 1079 Ariz. 1974
appeal dismissed and cert.
State v. Linne 501 P.2d 1186 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1972
State v. Linne 501 P.2d 1186 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1972
State v. Washington 447 P.2d 863 Ariz. 1968
State v. Washington 447 P.2d 863 Ariz. 1968
The well-established broad general rule of evidence is that the prosecution in a criminal case may not offer evidence of other unrelated criminal acts, , ; , .
State v. Pine 446 P.2d 940 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1968
State v. Pine 446 P.2d 940 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1968
State v. Norgard 429 P.2d 670 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1967
State v. Norgard 429 P.2d 670 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1967
Among the Arizona authority establishing this general rule to be the law of this state are: , 181 P. 175 (1919); , , , and
State v. Chaney 428 P.2d 1004 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1967
State v. Chaney 428 P.2d 1004 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1967
State v. Cobb 406 P.2d 421 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1965
State v. Cobb 406 P.2d 421 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1965
As was stated by our Supreme Court in the Hunt case, supra: “Admission of evidence concerning acts, which constitute other separate offenses is prejudicial to the accused receiving a fair and impartial trial, , 187 P. 579 ; , , unless such acts are shown to come within the exception to the general rule.
State v. Garcia 397 P.2d 214 Ariz. 1964
State v. Garcia 397 P.2d 214 Ariz. 1964
187 P. 579 ; , ; , ; , ; , .
State v. Hunt 370 P.2d 640 Ariz. 1962
State v. Hunt 370 P.2d 640 Ariz. 1962
Admission of evidence concerning acts which constitute other separate offenses is prejudicial to the accused receiving a fair and impartial trial, , 187 P. 579 ; , , unless such acts are shown to come within the exception to the general rule.
State v. Daymus 367 P.2d 647 Ariz. 1961
State v. Daymus 367 P.2d 647 Ariz. 1961
State v. Holman 356 P.2d 27 Ariz. 1960
State v. Holman 356 P.2d 27 Ariz. 1960
State v. Hudson 348 P.2d 928 Ariz. 1960
State v. Hudson 348 P.2d 928 Ariz. 1960
the admission of this kind of evidence constituted error.