Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite State v. Betts, 227 P.2d 749.

32 citing documents.

Koven v. Saberdyne Systems, Inc. 625 P.2d 907 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1980
Koven v. Saberdyne Systems, Inc. 625 P.2d 907 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1980
State v. Reinhold 597 P.2d 532 Ariz. 1979
State v. Reinhold 597 P.2d 532 Ariz. 1979
State v. Bateman 547 P.2d 6 Ariz. 1976
State v. Bateman 547 P.2d 6 Ariz. 1976
State v. Vanderlinden 519 P.2d 211 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1974
State v. Vanderlinden 519 P.2d 211 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1974
State v. McAlvain 454 P.2d 987 Ariz. 1969
State v. McAlvain 454 P.2d 987 Ariz. 1969
State v. Reynolds 449 P.2d 968 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1969
State v. Reynolds 449 P.2d 968 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1969
State v. Turner 416 P.2d 409 Ariz. 1966
State v. Turner 416 P.2d 409 Ariz. 1966
State v. Owen 415 P.2d 907 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1966
State v. Owen 415 P.2d 907 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1966
State v. Thompson 415 P.2d 566 Ariz. 1966
State v. Thompson 415 P.2d 566 Ariz. 1966
State v. Baker 402 P.2d 570 Ariz. 1965
State v. Baker 402 P.2d 570 Ariz. 1965
State v. Howard 400 P.2d 332 Ariz. 1965
State v. Howard 400 P.2d 332 Ariz. 1965
we approved this statement taken from People v. Curran, 24 Cal.App.2d 673 , : “ ‘ * * * The failure to so instruct the jury constitutes reversible error.
State v. Robinson 360 P.2d 474 Ariz. 1961
State v. Robinson 360 P.2d 474 Ariz. 1961
State v. Evans 356 P.2d 1106 Ariz. 1960
State v. Evans 356 P.2d 1106 Ariz. 1960
State v. Polan 293 P.2d 931 Ariz. 1956
State v. Polan 293 P.2d 931 Ariz. 1956
It is there pointed out that to adopt such a rule as is here urged by defendant “ ‘would be wrong in theory and mischievous in results’ ”, However, defendant contends we •have laid down a , , , .
State v. Folk 277 P.2d 1016 Ariz. 1954
State v. Folk 277 P.2d 1016 Ariz. 1954
State v. Betts, 1951, , ; Knight v. State, 1937, , .
State v. Chee 250 P.2d 985 Ariz. 1952
State v. Chee 250 P.2d 985 Ariz. 1952
answers both questions in the affirmative.