Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite State v. Eisenstein, 235 P.2d 1011.

69 citing documents.

State v. Mills 396 P.2d 5 Ariz. 1964
2 Wigmore, Evidence § 486 (3d ed. 1940).
State v. Maxwell 391 P.2d 560 Ariz. 1964
State v. Maxwell 391 P.2d 560 Ariz. 1964
Hafenstein v. Burr 376 P.2d 782 Ariz. 1962
Hafenstein v. Burr 376 P.2d 782 Ariz. 1962
The verb “premeditate” means to think on and revolve in the mind beforehand, to contrive and design previously.’ ” , .
State v. Crose 357 P.2d 136 Ariz. 1960
State v. Crose 357 P.2d 136 Ariz. 1960
State v. Evans 356 P.2d 1106 Ariz. 1960
State v. Evans 356 P.2d 1106 Ariz. 1960
State v. Hudson 348 P.2d 928 Ariz. 1960
State v. Hudson 348 P.2d 928 Ariz. 1960
The approach, accordingly, is that a failure to object to an offer of evidence at the time the offer is made, assigning the grounds, is a waiver of any ground of complaint against its admission.” , 225 P. 332 ; , ; , ; , .
State v. Coey 309 P.2d 260 Ariz. 1957
State v. Coey 309 P.2d 260 Ariz. 1957
State v. Folk 277 P.2d 1016 Ariz. 1954
State v. Folk 277 P.2d 1016 Ariz. 1954
Compare the instruction discussed in State v. Eisenstein, 1951, , .
State v. Polan 278 P.2d 432 Ariz. 1954
State v. Polan 278 P.2d 432 Ariz. 1954
Hill v. State, 1917, , 165 P. 326 ; State v. Upton, 1946, , ; State v. Eisenstein, 1951, , .
Wigley v. Whitten 276 P.2d 517 Ariz. 1954
Wigley v. Whitten 276 P.2d 517 Ariz. 1954
As stated in many cases, a nonexpert witness must always lay the foundation for his opinion by stating, as fully as possible, the evidential facts upon which he bases his opinion.” , , stated the rule in this language: “Non-expert witnesses may express opinions as to sanity or insanity only after they have testified to acts, conversations and conduct of the person whose sanity is in question, which to some extent indicates, sanity or lack of sanity and upon which they base th