Cited by
Opinions in Arizona that cite State v. Harris, 238 P.2d 957.
- State v. Daymus 367 P.2d 647 Ariz. 1961
-
State v. Daymus
367 P.2d 647
Ariz. 1961
this Court impliedly limited the introduction of prior convictions for impeachment purposes to those constituting a felony.
- State v. Loftis 363 P.2d 585 Ariz. 1961
- State v. Loftis 363 P.2d 585 Ariz. 1961
- State v. Vidalez 360 P.2d 224 Ariz. 1961
-
State v. Vidalez
360 P.2d 224
Ariz. 1961
and see Udall, Arizona Law of Evidence, Sec.
- State v. Holman 356 P.2d 27 Ariz. 1960
-
State v. Holman
356 P.2d 27
Ariz. 1960
959: “The majority of courts will allow on the cross-examination of the witness, specific acts of misconduct not sustained by a conviction to be shown which affect veracity.
- State v. Finley 338 P.2d 790 Ariz. 1959
- State v. Polan 278 P.2d 432 Ariz. 1954
-
State v. Polan
278 P.2d 432
Ariz. 1954
State v. Harris, 1951, , .