Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite State v. McLain, 245 P.2d 278.

74 citing documents.

State v. Taylor 2 P.3d 674 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1999
State v. Taylor 2 P.3d 674 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1999
(statements by children with altered demeanors made forty-five minutes after returning home admissible); , (child’s statement made less than an hour and a half after incident admissible); , (child’s statement made within forty-five minutes of incident admissible).
State v. Barnes 606 P.2d 802 Ariz. 1980
State v. Barnes 606 P.2d 802 Ariz. 1980
State v. Swinburne 569 P.2d 833 Ariz. 1977
State v. Swinburne 569 P.2d 833 Ariz. 1977
State v. Natzke 544 P.2d 1121 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1976
State v. Natzke 544 P.2d 1121 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1976
For this proposition, , and People v. Scott, 24 Cal.App.
Byars v. Arizona Public Service Company 539 P.2d 534 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1975
Byars v. Arizona Public Service Company 539 P.2d 534 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1975
The words spoken must relate to the startling event.”
State v. Kevil 527 P.2d 285 Ariz. 1974
State v. Kevil 527 P.2d 285 Ariz. 1974
State v. Lovely 517 P.2d 81 Ariz. 1973
State v. Lovely 517 P.2d 81 Ariz. 1973
State v. Kelley 516 P.2d 569 Ariz. 1973
State v. Kelley 516 P.2d 569 Ariz. 1973
Cavanagh v. Ohio Farmers Insurance Company 509 P.2d 1075 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1973
Cavanagh v. Ohio Farmers Insurance Company 509 P.2d 1075 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1973
Yellow Cab Co. of Phoenix, Inc. v. Green 494 P.2d 385 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1972
Yellow Cab Co. of Phoenix, Inc. v. Green 494 P.2d 385 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1972
State v. Morrow 493 P.2d 119 Ariz. 1972
State v. Morrow 493 P.2d 119 Ariz. 1972
’ “State v. Hunt, 2 Ariz.App.
State v. Ritchey 490 P.2d 558 Ariz. 1971
State v. Ritchey 490 P.2d 558 Ariz. 1971
State v. Dixon 489 P.2d 225 Ariz. 1971
State v. Dixon 489 P.2d 225 Ariz. 1971
” State v. Hunt, 2 Ariz.App.
State v. Tosatto 485 P.2d 556 Ariz. 1971
State v. Tosatto 485 P.2d 556 Ariz. 1971
State v. Lopez 484 P.2d 1045 Ariz. 1971
State v. Lopez 484 P.2d 1045 Ariz. 1971
State v. Sorensen 455 P.2d 981 Ariz. 1969
State v. Sorensen 455 P.2d 981 Ariz. 1969
The defendant requested that an instruction on absence of flight should have been given, arguing that “where flight is shown in the evidence, an instruction thereon is proper and not an undue comment on the evidence.”
State v. Evans 454 P.2d 976 Ariz. 1969
State v. Evans 454 P.2d 976 Ariz. 1969
1932 , 12 L.Ed.2d 1041 (1963)
State v. Boag 453 P.2d 508 Ariz. 1969
State v. Boag 453 P.2d 508 Ariz. 1969
State v. Dillon, supra; , ; , ; , ; , ; , ; , ; , .
State v. Dillon 448 P.2d 89 Ariz. 1968
State v. Dillon 448 P.2d 89 Ariz. 1968
: “ * * * In this assignment of error we have what is commonly called an excited utterance, or a spontaneous exclamation to which the term of ‘res gestae’ is sometimes applied.
State v. Abney 440 P.2d 914 Ariz. 1968
State v. Abney 440 P.2d 914 Ariz. 1968
Although we have held on various occasions that attorneys are given wide latitude in their arguments to the jury ( , ; , ; , ) nevertheless, in closing argument an attorney should never express his personal belief in the defendant’s guilt or innocence.
State v. Rodgers 435 P.2d 864 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1968
State v. Rodgers 435 P.2d 864 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1968
State v. Villalobos 430 P.2d 723 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1967
State v. Villalobos 430 P.2d 723 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1967
State v. White 426 P.2d 796 Ariz. 1967
State v. White 426 P.2d 796 Ariz. 1967
885 , 2 L.Ed.2d 863 ; , ; , .
State v. Miranda 416 P.2d 444 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1966
State v. Miranda 416 P.2d 444 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1966
State v. Robison 408 P.2d 29 Ariz. 1965
State v. Robison 408 P.2d 29 Ariz. 1965
885 , 2 L.Ed.2d 863 (1954)