Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite Arizona Corporation Commission v. Superior Court, 480 P.2d 988.

32 citing documents.

Lallande v. Penzone Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
Lallande v. Penzone Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
Ct., (concluding the superior court has concurrent jurisdiction with the Arizona Supreme Court to issue extraordinary writs to state officers).
Portillo-Diaz v. shinn/centurion Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
Portillo-Diaz v. shinn/centurion Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
Ariz. Const. art. 6, § 18; see also Ariz. Corp. Comm’n v. Superior Court
Dennison v. State Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
Dennison v. State Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
Ariz. Const. art. VI, § 18; see also Ariz. Corp. Comm’n v. Superior Court
Consolidated Water Utilities, Ltd. v. Arizona Corp. Commission 875 P.2d 137 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1993
Consolidated Water Utilities, Ltd. v. Arizona Corp. Commission 875 P.2d 137 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1993
Woods, , Arizona Corp. Comm’n v. Superior Ct., , see generally Deborah Scott Engelby, Comment, The Corporation Commission: Preserving Its Independence, 20 Ariz.St.L.J.
Rios v. Symington 833 P.2d 20 Ariz. 1992
Rios v. Symington 833 P.2d 20 Ariz. 1992
Ariz. Const, art. 6, § 5(1); see also Arizona Corp. Comm’n v. Superior Court
Arizona Corp. Commission v. State Ex Rel. Woods 830 P.2d 807 Ariz. 1992
Arizona Corp. Commission v. State Ex Rel. Woods 830 P.2d 807 Ariz. 1992
Arizona Corp. Comm’n v. Superior Court, -26 , -90 (1971).
Southwest Gas Corp. v. Arizona Corp. Commission 818 P.2d 714 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1991
Southwest Gas Corp. v. Arizona Corp. Commission 818 P.2d 714 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1991
Arizona Corp. Comm’n v. Superior Court, , (citing Tucson Gas, , 138 P. 781 (1914)).
State Ex Rel. Neely v. Rodriguez 796 P.2d 876 Ariz. 1990
State Ex Rel. Neely v. Rodriguez 796 P.2d 876 Ariz. 1990
Corporation Comm’n v. Superior Court, , 480 *
Pueblo Del Sol Water Co. v. Arizona Corp. Commission 772 P.2d 1138 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1988
Pueblo Del Sol Water Co. v. Arizona Corp. Commission 772 P.2d 1138 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1988
Pine-Strawberry Improvement Ass'n v. Arizona Corp. Commission 732 P.2d 230 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1986
Pine-Strawberry Improvement Ass'n v. Arizona Corp. Commission 732 P.2d 230 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1986
Gockley v. Arizona Department of Corrections 725 P.2d 1108 Ariz. 1986
Gockley v. Arizona Department of Corrections 725 P.2d 1108 Ariz. 1986
Arizona Corp. Comm’n v. Superior Court, -26 , -90 (1971).
State Ex Rel. Corbin v. Arizona Corp. Commission 693 P.2d 362 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1984
State Ex Rel. Corbin v. Arizona Corp. Commission 693 P.2d 362 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1984
See, , State v. Tucson Gas, Electric Light & Power Co., , 138 P. 781 (1914).
Mountain States Telephone & Telegraph Co. v. Arizona Corp. Commission 604 P.2d 1144 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1979
MOUNTAIN STATES, ETC. v. Ariz. Corp. Com'n 604 P.2d 1144 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1979
MOUNTAIN STATES, ETC. v. Ariz. Corp. Com'n 604 P.2d 1144 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1979
that the setting of rates is a legislative function.
Mountain States Telephone & Telegraph Co. v. Arizona Corp. Commission 604 P.2d 1144 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1979
Appellant’s argument is based on the Supreme Court’s , that the setting of rates is a legislative function.
Sun City Water Co. v. Arizona Corporation Com'n 547 P.2d 1104 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1976
Sun City Water Co. v. Arizona Corporation Com'n 547 P.2d 1104 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1976
Johnson v. Superior Court 483 P.2d 561 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1971
Johnson v. Superior Court 483 P.2d 561 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1971
the Supreme Court reviewed the denial of a motion to dismiss.